The Troubling Case(s) of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through the Criminal Justice System and the Effect on Families

million of them are undocumented. 4 The federal government has greatly escalated the rate at which it removes noncitizens from the U.S. 5 For example, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") removes about 400 thousand noncitizens per year, or about 1,000 per day. 6 Despite the large number of noncitizens removed, federal courts have held that it is not the government's role to remove every noncitizen.For example, in Kang v. United States, Jinyu Kang, a citizen of China, fled to the United States and sought asylum. 7 After finding that the record "compels the conclusion that if Kang is removed to China it is more likely that she will be beaten, suffocated, deprived of sleep, shocked with electrical current, and/or forced to stand for long periods of time," the court granted Kang Convention Against Torture ("CAT") relief. 8 In doing so, the court noted that the government's role is to "seek justice rather than victory," and the court was in "distress" when the government failed to live up to that duty in this case. 9 And the problem, according to Jill E.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tennessee journal of law & policy
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70658/1940-4131.1225
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Troubling Case(s) of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through the Criminal Justice System and the Effect on Families

Juan Quevedo
Tennessee journal of law & policy
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

The Troubling Case(s) of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through the Criminal Justice System and the Effect on Families

Juan Quevedo
article en

Abstract

million of them are undocumented. 4 The federal government has greatly escalated the rate at which it removes noncitizens from the U.S. 5 For example, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") removes about 400 thousand noncitizens per year, or about 1,000 per day. 6 Despite the large number of noncitizens removed, federal courts have held that it is not the government's role to remove every noncitizen.For example, in Kang v. United States, Jinyu Kang, a citizen of China, fled to the United States and sought asylum. 7 After finding that the record "compels the conclusion that if Kang is removed to China it is more likely that she will be beaten, suffocated, deprived of sleep, shocked with electrical current, and/or forced to stand for long periods of time," the court granted Kang Convention Against Torture ("CAT") relief. 8 In doing so, the court noted that the government's role is to "seek justice rather than victory," and the court was in "distress" when the government failed to live up to that duty in this case. 9 And the problem, according to Jill E.

Tennessee journal of law & policyVol. 10(2)
Widener University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Troubling Case(s) of Noncitizens: Immigration Enforcement Through the Criminal Justice System and the Effect on Families — Juan Quevedo · Tennessee journal of law & policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS