Evidence-Based Implementation Support: Considering Motivation and Capacity Within the Ecosystem of Training and Technical Assistance
This invited commentary reflects on Wandersman and Scheier's (2024) call for a more evidence-based model of training and technical assistance (i.e. TTA or implementation support). Their clarion call prompts us to consider what steps need to be taken to refine and scale a solution that genuinely enhances the effectiveness of TTA through a re-imagined model of implementation support. We highlight eight priorities to re-imagine a more effective and efficient model of TTA that reflects best practice and simultaneously contributes to continuous, collective evidence-building. The eight priorities include: (1) an ecosystem of TTA connecting TTA research and practice; (2) TTA capacity building; (3) health equity, and equitable partnerships; (4) trust and relationships; (5) TTA evaluation; (6) continuous quality improvement; (7) implementation support mechanisms; and (8) cost-effective solutions. We advocate for an international, cross-disciplinary, applied agenda aimed at establishing a robust empirical foundation for TTA to foster a culture of continuous quality improvement and knowledge generation across government agencies and philanthropies that fund TTA Centers. We describe a potential scenario for how funders can initiate and support evidence-based TTA.
Authors
- Brian K. Bumbarger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6253-9523)
- Margaret E. Crane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-3364)
- Julia E. Moore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8147-6347)
Institutions
- Brown University (US)
- RED Consulting (Norway) (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Evaluation & the Health Professions
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241293457
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.40