Thromboprophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients

<strong>Background</strong>: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are at twice the risk of experiencing thrombosis compared to patients in regular wards. This risk is associated with prolonged immobility, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade to facilitate ventilation. The incidence ranges from 8-40%. This undoubtedly leads to poorer patient outcomes, including increased patient mortality. ICU patients require prophylaxis to prevent thrombotic events. The use of thromboprophylaxis has been shown to reduce mortality rates in these patients.<br /><strong>Content</strong>: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are at risk of developing thrombosis, which is closely related to Virchow's triad, which consists of venous stasis, endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulability. Considering the high morbidity associated with thrombotic events and the low side effects of carefully administered anticoagulants, pharmacological prophylaxis should be provided to all critically ill patients without contraindications to anticoagulants. Regular monitoring is necessary when administering pharmacological prophylaxis. Compared with UFH and mechanical compression, LMWH is the preferred thromboprophylaxis for ICU patients. Generally, patients weighing 50-100 kg can be given LMWH, such as enoxaparin, at a subcutaneous dose of 40 mg per day. The discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis should consider the patient's clinical condition and drug side effects.<br /><strong>Summary:</strong> Thromboprophylaxis is highly necessary for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. The preferred thromboprophylaxis for ICU patients is LMWH. In certain circumstances, UFH or mechanical thromboprophylaxis may be considered.<br /><br />

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solo Journal of Anesthesi Pain & Critical Care (SOJA)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20961/soja.v4i2.93687
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thromboprophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Calcarina Fitriani R.W, Fachrizal Rikardi
Solo Journal of Anesthesi Pain & Critical Care (SOJA)
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Thromboprophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Calcarina Fitriani R.W, Fachrizal Rikardi
article en

Abstract

<strong>Background</strong>: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are at twice the risk of experiencing thrombosis compared to patients in regular wards. This risk is associated with prolonged immobility, sedation, and neuromuscular blockade to facilitate ventilation. The incidence ranges from 8-40%. This undoubtedly leads to poorer patient outcomes, including increased patient mortality. ICU patients require prophylaxis to prevent thrombotic events. The use of thromboprophylaxis has been shown to reduce mortality rates in these patients.<br /><strong>Content</strong>: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients are at risk of developing thrombosis, which is closely related to Virchow's triad, which consists of venous stasis, endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulability. Considering the high morbidity associated with thrombotic events and the low side effects of carefully administered anticoagulants, pharmacological prophylaxis should be provided to all critically ill patients without contraindications to anticoagulants. Regular monitoring is necessary when administering pharmacological prophylaxis. Compared with UFH and mechanical compression, LMWH is the preferred thromboprophylaxis for ICU patients. Generally, patients weighing 50-100 kg can be given LMWH, such as enoxaparin, at a subcutaneous dose of 40 mg per day. The discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis should consider the patient's clinical condition and drug side effects.<br /><strong>Summary:</strong> Thromboprophylaxis is highly necessary for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. The preferred thromboprophylaxis for ICU patients is LMWH. In certain circumstances, UFH or mechanical thromboprophylaxis may be considered.<br /><br />

Solo Journal of Anesthesi Pain & Critical Care (SOJA)Vol. 4(2)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thromboprophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients — Calcarina Fitriani R.W, Fachrizal Rikardi · Solo Journal of Anesthesi Pain & Critical Care (SOJA) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS