Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI-BrA) for Use in Brazilian Adolescents

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Brazilian Adolescents (DHLI-BrA). Two hundred and sixty Brazilian adolescents answered the DHLI-BrA and the Brazilian version of quality-of-life and health literacy instruments: WHOQOL-Bref, eHEALS-BrA, NVS-BR, and REALMD-20. Then, they answered a questionnaire on sociodemographics, health, Internet access, and digital health aspects. The data collection was conducted between September and December of 2022.The statistical test assessed internal consistency, stability, discriminant and convergent validities, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory (IRT) analysis using 2PL was applied to performance-based DHLI-BrA. The DHLI-BrA self-reported questions demonstrated almost perfect internal consistency (α and ω = 0.83) and good stability (ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of six factors (χ<sup>2</sup> = 229.173 (df = 174, <i>p</i> = 0.003), CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.035, and RMSR = 0.047). The performance-based DHLI-BrA demonstrated moderate internal consistency (α = 0.57 and KR20 = 0.56) and good stability (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of a single factor (χ<sup>2</sup> = 17.901 (df = 14, <i>p</i> = 0.2113), CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.033, and RMSR = 0.038). IRT analyses revealed item discrimination ranging from -0.71 to 1.83 and difficulty from -1.53 to 1.02. Convergent validity of the self-reported DHLI-BrA was obtained by its correlation with the eHEALS-BrA (r = 0.45) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.19), besides the performance-based DHLI-BrA with its correlation with the NVS (r = 0.47) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.44). The DHLI-BrA demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to measure the self-reported, performance-based digital health literacy of Brazilian typically developing adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111458
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI-BrA) for Use in Brazilian Adolescents

Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Luiza Peres Baldiotti, Fernanda Morais Ferreira, Ramon Targino Firmino et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
1.70
article

Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI-BrA) for Use in Brazilian Adolescents

Saul Martins Paiva, Ana Luiza Peres Baldiotti, Fernanda Morais Ferreira, Ramon Targino Firmino, Ana Flávia Granville‐Garcia, Mariane Carolina Faria Barbosa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of Digital Health Literacy Instrument for Brazilian Adolescents (DHLI-BrA). Two hundred and sixty Brazilian adolescents answered the DHLI-BrA and the Brazilian version of quality-of-life and health literacy instruments: WHOQOL-Bref, eHEALS-BrA, NVS-BR, and REALMD-20. Then, they answered a questionnaire on sociodemographics, health, Internet access, and digital health aspects. The data collection was conducted between September and December of 2022.The statistical test assessed internal consistency, stability, discriminant and convergent validities, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Item response theory (IRT) analysis using 2PL was applied to performance-based DHLI-BrA. The DHLI-BrA self-reported questions demonstrated almost perfect internal consistency (α and ω = 0.83) and good stability (ICC = 0.906; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of six factors (χ<sup>2</sup> = 229.173 (df = 174, <i>p</i> = 0.003), CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.035, and RMSR = 0.047). The performance-based DHLI-BrA demonstrated moderate internal consistency (α = 0.57 and KR20 = 0.56) and good stability (ICC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). In EFA and CFA, the best-adjusted model was composed of a single factor (χ<sup>2</sup> = 17.901 (df = 14, <i>p</i> = 0.2113), CFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.033, and RMSR = 0.038). IRT analyses revealed item discrimination ranging from -0.71 to 1.83 and difficulty from -1.53 to 1.02. Convergent validity of the self-reported DHLI-BrA was obtained by its correlation with the eHEALS-BrA (r = 0.45) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.19), besides the performance-based DHLI-BrA with its correlation with the NVS (r = 0.47) and REALMD-20 (r = 0.44). The DHLI-BrA demonstrated adequate psychometric properties to measure the self-reported, performance-based digital health literacy of Brazilian typically developing adolescents.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 21(11)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (BR), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.