Testing summary tables in the life history questions of the UK Generations and Gender Survey

Collecting data about retrospective events is important for understanding the lifecourse. However, little is known about the best way to collect these data, especially in a self-completion online survey. This paper examines whether including summary tables after asking respondents a series of life history questions helps improve respondents’ recall of the month and year these events occurred. We used a technique commonly used at the questionnaire design and testing stage called ‘cogability testing’ (combination of cognitive interview and usability testing) in the survey design phase of the United Kingdom Generations and Gender Survey. Contrary to expectations, the summary tables did not improve data quality; instead, respondents raised concerns about data privacy and safety, with some even requesting their data to be removed. While these findings are based on a small sample size and not generalizable, they provide insights suggesting that researchers and survey practitioners need to explore other ways of collecting life history data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Survey Practice
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2024-0015
Primary Topic
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing summary tables in the life history questions of the UK Generations and Gender Survey

Ann Berrington, G. B. Chang, Brienna Perelli‐Harris, Olga Maslovskaya et al.
Survey Practice
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
article

Testing summary tables in the life history questions of the UK Generations and Gender Survey

Ann Berrington, G. B. Chang, Brienna Perelli‐Harris, Olga Maslovskaya, Olivia Sexton, Richard Bull, Joanna D’Ardenne, Shane Howe
article en

Abstract

Collecting data about retrospective events is important for understanding the lifecourse. However, little is known about the best way to collect these data, especially in a self-completion online survey. This paper examines whether including summary tables after asking respondents a series of life history questions helps improve respondents’ recall of the month and year these events occurred. We used a technique commonly used at the questionnaire design and testing stage called ‘cogability testing’ (combination of cognitive interview and usability testing) in the survey design phase of the United Kingdom Generations and Gender Survey. Contrary to expectations, the summary tables did not improve data quality; instead, respondents raised concerns about data privacy and safety, with some even requesting their data to be removed. While these findings are based on a small sample size and not generalizable, they provide insights suggesting that researchers and survey practitioners need to explore other ways of collecting life history data.

Survey Practice
Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing summary tables in the life history questions of the UK Generations and Gender Survey — Ann Berrington, G. B. Chang, et al. · Survey Practice (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS