Impact of Hyperuricemia on Clinical Outcomes in Sepsis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> Hyperuricemia has been linked to various adverse clinical outcomes. Data on the clinical outcomes and the relationship between hyperuricemia and sepsis remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hyperuricemia on clinical outcomes in sepsis patients and to identify whether it can predict the mortality in this patient population. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023. The patients were divided into hyperuricemia and non-hyperuricemia groups. Hyperuricemia was defined as a serum uric acid level > 416.4 µmol/L (7.0 mg/dL) in males or >357.0 µmol/L (6.0 mg/dL) in females based on the first serum uric acid reading within 24 h of ICU admission. The primary outcome of this study was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, progression to septic shock, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOSs). <b>Results:</b> A total of 599 patients were included in the study. Among these, 303 were in hyperuricemia group, while 296 were in the non-hyperuricemia group. The incidence of ICU and in-hospital mortality was higher in the hyperuricemia group compared to the non-hyperuricemia group (26.7% vs. 18.9% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and 34.7% vs. 19.3% (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively). After adjusting for cofounders, hyperuricemia was not a predictor of ICU mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.95-2.43, <i>p</i> = 0.083). Most secondary outcomes were similar between the groups. However, the hyperuricemia group had a higher incidence of progression to septic shock (67.3% vs. 50.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and hospital LOS was significantly longer in the hyperuricemia group (384 vs. 264 h, <i>p</i> = 0.004). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings demonstrated that hyperuricemia in sepsis patients was associated with worse clinical outcomes such as higher ICU and hospital mortality. Moreover, there was a higher incidence of septic shock progression and longer hospital LOS. The other outcomes were not statistically significantly different. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.