Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications

<b>Background</b>: Vascular access site complications (VASCs) after endovascular interventions requiring a large-bore access are frequent and known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although balloon-expandable covered stents (BECSs) are increasingly used in such indications, their performance in this rather hostile territory is currently unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BECSs in common femoral artery (CFA) VASCs management. <b>Methods</b>: This is a national multicenter retrospective study of all patients who underwent BECS implantation of the CFA due to a VASCs after an endovascular procedure between January 2020 and May 2023 in major tertiary referral centers in Hungary. Operative data were collected and follow-up ultrasound examinations were performed. Our study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05220540) and followed the STROBE guidelines. <b>Results</b>: Of the 23 patients enrolled (13 females, mean age: 74.2 ± 8.6), technical success was achieved in 21 (91.3%) cases, with one perioperative death. After an average follow-up of 18.0 ± 11.4 months, another nine (39.1%) deaths occurred, and one was VASCs-associated. BECS occlusion was detected in one (4.3%) patient, being the only reintervention (4.3%) where revascularization was also achieved. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although BECS implantation for CFA VASCs is feasible with a relatively high technical success rate, the mortality rate is non-negligible. Until adequately evaluated, BECS implantation in such indications is to be used with caution, ideally only within the framework of a trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216550
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications

Roland Papp, András Süvegh, Zoltán Ruzsa, Ákos Bérczi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Vascular Procedures and Complications
0.42
article

Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications

Roland Papp, András Süvegh, Zoltán Ruzsa, Ákos Bérczi, Levente Molnár, Tamás Szűcsborús, Csaba Csobay-Novák, András Szentiványi, Géza Fontos, Sarolta Borzsák, Csaba Imre Szalay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Vascular access site complications (VASCs) after endovascular interventions requiring a large-bore access are frequent and known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although balloon-expandable covered stents (BECSs) are increasingly used in such indications, their performance in this rather hostile territory is currently unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BECSs in common femoral artery (CFA) VASCs management. <b>Methods</b>: This is a national multicenter retrospective study of all patients who underwent BECS implantation of the CFA due to a VASCs after an endovascular procedure between January 2020 and May 2023 in major tertiary referral centers in Hungary. Operative data were collected and follow-up ultrasound examinations were performed. Our study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05220540) and followed the STROBE guidelines. <b>Results</b>: Of the 23 patients enrolled (13 females, mean age: 74.2 ± 8.6), technical success was achieved in 21 (91.3%) cases, with one perioperative death. After an average follow-up of 18.0 ± 11.4 months, another nine (39.1%) deaths occurred, and one was VASCs-associated. BECS occlusion was detected in one (4.3%) patient, being the only reintervention (4.3%) where revascularization was also achieved. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although BECS implantation for CFA VASCs is feasible with a relatively high technical success rate, the mortality rate is non-negligible. Until adequately evaluated, BECS implantation in such indications is to be used with caution, ideally only within the framework of a trial.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Semmelweis University (HU), University of Szeged (HU), Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center (HU)
European Commission, Semmelweis Egyetem
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.