Research on Accident Prediction of Nuclear Power Plants Based on Deep Learning

Abstract Based on the bidirectional long short-term memory network (BILSTM) and the long short-term memory network (LSTM), this paper uses the rolling update mechanism (RU) to obtain the time series training set data and test set data of the original data, and predicts the water level and pressure changes of the Pressurizer after the LOCA accident in nuclear power plants, so as to provide a certain reference for the prediction of LOCA accidents in nuclear power plants. Specifically, the following conclusions are obtained: Compared with the LSTM model, the BILSTM model has better prediction results and less prediction loss. Although the average error of the prediction results of the two models is 10−3 orders of magnitude, the average error of BILSTM is reduced by more than 20% compared with LSTM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/icone31-134779
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Accident Prediction of Nuclear Power Plants Based on Deep Learning

Jiangkuan Li, Wei Zhong Lv, Sichao Tan, Tong Li et al.
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Research on Accident Prediction of Nuclear Power Plants Based on Deep Learning

Jiangkuan Li, Wei Zhong Lv, Sichao Tan, Tong Li, Bo Wang, Ruifeng Tian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Based on the bidirectional long short-term memory network (BILSTM) and the long short-term memory network (LSTM), this paper uses the rolling update mechanism (RU) to obtain the time series training set data and test set data of the original data, and predicts the water level and pressure changes of the Pressurizer after the LOCA accident in nuclear power plants, so as to provide a certain reference for the prediction of LOCA accidents in nuclear power plants. Specifically, the following conclusions are obtained: Compared with the LSTM model, the BILSTM model has better prediction results and less prediction loss. Although the average error of the prediction results of the two models is 10−3 orders of magnitude, the average error of BILSTM is reduced by more than 20% compared with LSTM.

Harbin Engineering University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.