Scoring the Outcomes of 1-3-3 Multistage Model of Computerised Adaptive Testing

The given paper discusses an original method of the evaluation of outcomes of adaptive testing in the case of the strategy of the multilevel testing. The multiplicity/set of the outcomes of testing consists of atypical different-dimensional elements. The given paper defines the criteria of their comparison, describes the principles of ordering of the given multiplicity and draws the getting of a final score. The paper presented considers the ordering method of outcome set for multi-stage testing (MST) of 1-3-3 model. The ordering method of outcome set is used for the estimation of results of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This method is not tied to a specific testing procedure. Acknowledgment of this is its usage for the 1-3-3 model, which is described in the paper. To sort the set of testing outcomes the function-criteria described in the initial article are used here and a comparative analysis of obtained results is performed. The criterion of ordering of the outcomes of testing may not be the only option. The given paper illustrates this fact through a comparative discussion of two samples. An original procedure of testing is used for the presentation of the essence of the method. The given procedure is aimed to be illustrative, because a described method of assessment can be used for similar strategies. The ordered outcome set is estimated by a hundred-point system according to the normal distribution. Applied results of our scientific research is developed as “Adaptester” portal and available on the following address: https://adaptester.com .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Programming and Computer Software
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0361768824700361
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoring the Outcomes of 1-3-3 Multistage Model of Computerised Adaptive Testing

Simon Razmadze
1 citations
Programming and Computer Software
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
article

Scoring the Outcomes of 1-3-3 Multistage Model of Computerised Adaptive Testing

Simon Razmadze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The given paper discusses an original method of the evaluation of outcomes of adaptive testing in the case of the strategy of the multilevel testing. The multiplicity/set of the outcomes of testing consists of atypical different-dimensional elements. The given paper defines the criteria of their comparison, describes the principles of ordering of the given multiplicity and draws the getting of a final score. The paper presented considers the ordering method of outcome set for multi-stage testing (MST) of 1-3-3 model. The ordering method of outcome set is used for the estimation of results of computerized adaptive testing (CAT). This method is not tied to a specific testing procedure. Acknowledgment of this is its usage for the 1-3-3 model, which is described in the paper. To sort the set of testing outcomes the function-criteria described in the initial article are used here and a comparative analysis of obtained results is performed. The criterion of ordering of the outcomes of testing may not be the only option. The given paper illustrates this fact through a comparative discussion of two samples. An original procedure of testing is used for the presentation of the essence of the method. The given procedure is aimed to be illustrative, because a described method of assessment can be used for similar strategies. The ordered outcome set is estimated by a hundred-point system according to the normal distribution. Applied results of our scientific research is developed as “Adaptester” portal and available on the following address: https://adaptester.com .

Programming and Computer SoftwareVol. 50(S1)
Georgian National Museum (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.