Spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs in the Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight regions during 1968–2021

Abstract Objective The commercial importance of Jonah crabs Cancer borealis and Atlantic rock crabs Cancer irroratus has increased over the past few decades, but both species are still data limited. Objectives were to determine the spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs over time and to estimate associations with environmental variables. Methods Data were from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center offshore spring bottom trawl surveys during 1968–2021 on Georges Bank and in the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Environmental preferences for temperature (°C), depth (m), and grain size (ϕ) were estimated using generalized additive models, and the habitat usage between the two crabs were compared using empirical cumulative distribution functions. Result The spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs changed over time. Grain size was the most important environmental variable for predicting presence of Jonah crabs, and depth was the most important variable for explaining presence of Atlantic rock crabs. The generalized additive model with the best cross validation and the lowest Akaike information criterion for both crabs included all environmental, spatial, and temporal variables. Conclusion Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs have different spatial distributions and environmental preferences. Jonah crabs preferred slightly warmer temperatures, deeper depths, and muddier sediments than Atlantic rock crabs. As the commercial importance for Jonah crabs increases, information on their population distribution and habitat usage is important for effective management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10315
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs in the Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight regions during 1968–2021

Daniel W. Cullen, Michael J. Wilberg, Burton Shank, Kaitlynn J. Wade
Marine and Coastal Fisheries
Marine and fisheries research
article

Spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs in the Georges Bank and Mid-Atlantic Bight regions during 1968–2021

Daniel W. Cullen, Michael J. Wilberg, Burton Shank, Kaitlynn J. Wade
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective The commercial importance of Jonah crabs Cancer borealis and Atlantic rock crabs Cancer irroratus has increased over the past few decades, but both species are still data limited. Objectives were to determine the spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs over time and to estimate associations with environmental variables. Methods Data were from the Northeast Fisheries Science Center offshore spring bottom trawl surveys during 1968–2021 on Georges Bank and in the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Environmental preferences for temperature (°C), depth (m), and grain size (ϕ) were estimated using generalized additive models, and the habitat usage between the two crabs were compared using empirical cumulative distribution functions. Result The spatial distributions of Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs changed over time. Grain size was the most important environmental variable for predicting presence of Jonah crabs, and depth was the most important variable for explaining presence of Atlantic rock crabs. The generalized additive model with the best cross validation and the lowest Akaike information criterion for both crabs included all environmental, spatial, and temporal variables. Conclusion Jonah and Atlantic rock crabs have different spatial distributions and environmental preferences. Jonah crabs preferred slightly warmer temperatures, deeper depths, and muddier sediments than Atlantic rock crabs. As the commercial importance for Jonah crabs increases, information on their population distribution and habitat usage is important for effective management.

Marine and Coastal FisheriesVol. 16(5)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US), University of Maryland Eastern Shore (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.