Working at home: Individual level drivers of MEPs’ focus on constituency work

Abstract This article investigates how Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) allocate resources between their parliamentary and constituency work, focusing on their staffing decisions. Specifically, it examines the distribution of MEPs’ staff between accredited assistants, based in the European Parliament (EP), and local staff working in their constituency. The study seeks to explain why some MEPs allocate a larger share of their staff to constituency work compared to others by testing several hypotheses related to the individual characteristics of MEPs while controlling for variations across Member States. Using a newly developed database with data on MEP assistants at three points during the 9th EP, the analysis reveals that Member State differences do not solely explain the variation in staff distribution. While there is no evidence that staff allocation is driven by strategic considerations to secure re-election, it depends significantly on their ideology and past political experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae034
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working at home: Individual level drivers of MEPs’ focus on constituency work

Thomas Laloux, Clement Laloux
Parliamentary Affairs
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Working at home: Individual level drivers of MEPs’ focus on constituency work

Thomas Laloux, Clement Laloux
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates how Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) allocate resources between their parliamentary and constituency work, focusing on their staffing decisions. Specifically, it examines the distribution of MEPs’ staff between accredited assistants, based in the European Parliament (EP), and local staff working in their constituency. The study seeks to explain why some MEPs allocate a larger share of their staff to constituency work compared to others by testing several hypotheses related to the individual characteristics of MEPs while controlling for variations across Member States. Using a newly developed database with data on MEP assistants at three points during the 9th EP, the analysis reveals that Member State differences do not solely explain the variation in staff distribution. While there is no evidence that staff allocation is driven by strategic considerations to secure re-election, it depends significantly on their ideology and past political experience.

Parliamentary AffairsVol. 78(3)
Fund for Scientific Research (BE), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Working at home: Individual level drivers of MEPs’ focus on constituency work — Thomas Laloux, Clement Laloux · Parliamentary Affairs (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS