A Nation-Wide Evaluation of Suboptimal Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns Among Patients Undergoing Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Hungary

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: A significant gap exists between guideline recommendations and everyday practice. Stringent treatment is needed for vulnerable patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). <b>Methods</b>: Data on the lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), including the adherence, persistence, and mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in Hungary in 2018 were followed up and analyzed based on the National Health Insurance Fund database until the end of 2020. <b>Results</b>: A total of 12,997 patients underwent revascularization for ACS in 2018, whose discharge therapy included any LLT, a high- or moderate-intensity statin, or ezetimibe at a proportion of 91%, 75%, 12%, and 4%, respectively. By the end of the observation period, the frequency of ezetimibe administration increased to 11%. Persistence decreased, reaching 50% for all therapeutic regimens by month 16. Patients on moderate statin doses had a significantly higher mortality rate at the end of follow-up than those receiving high-intensity statin with (20% vs. 9%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) or without (20% vs. 14%, <i>p</i> = 0.00029) ezetimibe. Those taking less potent statin doses had higher rates of comorbidities; for example, a minimum of three comorbidities were present in 39% of patients taking medium statin doses and 23% among those on high-intensity statin therapy (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: LLT persistence decreased during follow-up. The administration of a higher-intensity lipid-lowering regimen was associated with better persistence and adherence, along with more favorable mortality rates. Multimorbidity was associated with the use of lower statin doses. The results suggest that more attention is needed in terms of lipid control of females, elderly people, and individuals with several comorbidities, and emphasis should be placed on improving persistence and increasing the frequency of combined LLT prescriptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216562
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Nation-Wide Evaluation of Suboptimal Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns Among Patients Undergoing Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Hungary

Ibolya Fábián, György Paragh, Norbert Kiss, György Rokszin et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
1.15
article

A Nation-Wide Evaluation of Suboptimal Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns Among Patients Undergoing Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Hungary

Ibolya Fábián, György Paragh, Norbert Kiss, György Rokszin, Andrea Gerencsér, Daniel Aradi, István Karádi, Zoltán Csanádi, László Márk, László Bajnok, G Nagy, István Reiber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: A significant gap exists between guideline recommendations and everyday practice. Stringent treatment is needed for vulnerable patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). <b>Methods</b>: Data on the lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), including the adherence, persistence, and mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in Hungary in 2018 were followed up and analyzed based on the National Health Insurance Fund database until the end of 2020. <b>Results</b>: A total of 12,997 patients underwent revascularization for ACS in 2018, whose discharge therapy included any LLT, a high- or moderate-intensity statin, or ezetimibe at a proportion of 91%, 75%, 12%, and 4%, respectively. By the end of the observation period, the frequency of ezetimibe administration increased to 11%. Persistence decreased, reaching 50% for all therapeutic regimens by month 16. Patients on moderate statin doses had a significantly higher mortality rate at the end of follow-up than those receiving high-intensity statin with (20% vs. 9%, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) or without (20% vs. 14%, <i>p</i> = 0.00029) ezetimibe. Those taking less potent statin doses had higher rates of comorbidities; for example, a minimum of three comorbidities were present in 39% of patients taking medium statin doses and 23% among those on high-intensity statin therapy (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions</b>: LLT persistence decreased during follow-up. The administration of a higher-intensity lipid-lowering regimen was associated with better persistence and adherence, along with more favorable mortality rates. Multimorbidity was associated with the use of lower statin doses. The results suggest that more attention is needed in terms of lipid control of females, elderly people, and individuals with several comorbidities, and emphasis should be placed on improving persistence and increasing the frequency of combined LLT prescriptions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Semmelweis University (HU), University of Debrecen (HU), Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Megyei Kórház és Egyetemi Oktató Kórház (HU), Novartis (Hungary) (HU), Békés Megyei Központi Kórház (HU), University of Pecs (HU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.