Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Block Following Unilateral Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Background: Caudal epidural block (CEB) has long been used as a standard method for pain control in pediatric surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer technique that has attracted attention for its potential to provide analgesia in children. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of ESPB and caudal block on postoperative pain in pediatric patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: This prospective, randomized trial was conducted with a total of 60 pediatric patients, aged 1–8 years, in the ASA I–II group. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as Group CEB ( n = 30), and Group ESPB ( n = 30). In the caudal block group, 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg (max 20 ml) was administered in the caudal space, while in the ESPB block group, the block was performed with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% (max 20 ml) bupivacaine at the L1 vertebral level. Face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores were recorded postoperatively at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 th hours. The first analgesic requirements and time for rescue analgesia were also recorded. Results: While no significant difference was noticed between the two groups’ FLACC scores at the zeroth hour, first hour, second hour, fourth hour, and sixth hour (i.e. postoperatively [ P > 0.05]), the FLACC scores of 12 th hour in the ESPB group were significantly lower than the caudal block group ( P < 0.05). There was also no significant difference in intraoperative additional analgesia requirements between the groups ( P > 0.05). The time to first postoperative analgesia in the ESPB group was higher than that in the caudal block group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia to the CEB in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, and ESPB can be used as a relatively safer postoperative multimodal analgesia approach as an alternative to CEB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_408_24
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Block Following Unilateral Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Kenan Kart, İlker İtal, Mehmet Gençer
1 links
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Epidural Block Following Unilateral Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Kenan Kart, İlker İtal, Mehmet Gençer
article en

Abstract

Background: Caudal epidural block (CEB) has long been used as a standard method for pain control in pediatric surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer technique that has attracted attention for its potential to provide analgesia in children. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of ESPB and caudal block on postoperative pain in pediatric patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. Methods: This prospective, randomized trial was conducted with a total of 60 pediatric patients, aged 1–8 years, in the ASA I–II group. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as Group CEB ( n = 30), and Group ESPB ( n = 30). In the caudal block group, 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5 ml/kg (max 20 ml) was administered in the caudal space, while in the ESPB block group, the block was performed with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% (max 20 ml) bupivacaine at the L1 vertebral level. Face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scores were recorded postoperatively at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 th hours. The first analgesic requirements and time for rescue analgesia were also recorded. Results: While no significant difference was noticed between the two groups’ FLACC scores at the zeroth hour, first hour, second hour, fourth hour, and sixth hour (i.e. postoperatively [ P > 0.05]), the FLACC scores of 12 th hour in the ESPB group were significantly lower than the caudal block group ( P < 0.05). There was also no significant difference in intraoperative additional analgesia requirements between the groups ( P > 0.05). The time to first postoperative analgesia in the ESPB group was higher than that in the caudal block group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia to the CEB in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, and ESPB can be used as a relatively safer postoperative multimodal analgesia approach as an alternative to CEB.

Nigerian Journal of Clinical PracticeVol. 27(10)
Karabük University (TR), İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.