The makings of social meaning: Cassirer and Castoriadis

Abstract Two of the most interesting attempts of the 20th century to conceptualise, assess and understand the production, functioning and institutionalisation of social imaginary meanings were made by, first, a major thinker in the post-Kantian philosophical anthropological tradition, the German philosopher Ernst Cassirer, and, years later, by French-Greek philosopher and psychoanalyst Cornelius Castoriadis. Both offer ways of thinking and understanding the current political contexts, and point to and offer concepts for articulating difficulties and obstacles facing us today. The affinities between Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms and Castoriadis’s take on social imaginary significations are many and striking, despite the fact that Castoriadis never explicitly referred to his predecessor. This article pinpoints some of the affinities, and makes an argument for the political topicality of both thinkers still today.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/27727866-bja00040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The makings of social meaning: Cassirer and Castoriadis

Mats Rosengren
1 citations
International Journal of Social Imaginaries
Philosophy, Science, and History
6.04
article

The makings of social meaning: Cassirer and Castoriadis

Mats Rosengren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Two of the most interesting attempts of the 20th century to conceptualise, assess and understand the production, functioning and institutionalisation of social imaginary meanings were made by, first, a major thinker in the post-Kantian philosophical anthropological tradition, the German philosopher Ernst Cassirer, and, years later, by French-Greek philosopher and psychoanalyst Cornelius Castoriadis. Both offer ways of thinking and understanding the current political contexts, and point to and offer concepts for articulating difficulties and obstacles facing us today. The affinities between Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms and Castoriadis’s take on social imaginary significations are many and striking, despite the fact that Castoriadis never explicitly referred to his predecessor. This article pinpoints some of the affinities, and makes an argument for the political topicality of both thinkers still today.

International Journal of Social ImaginariesVol. 3(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Philosophy, Science, and History
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.