A Phenomenological Study on Experience of Using Generative AI by University Students

Objectives This study aims to explore the direction of Generative AI literacy education through the exploration of college students' experiences using Generative AI. Methods For this purpose, written and face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 university stu-dents (5 male students and 7 female students) and analyzed by applying Colaizzi's phenomenological method, which consists of seven steps to explore the nature of common experiences rather than the individual participants. Results As a result of analyzing the interview data, 5 semantic themes and 14 sub-themes were derived under the essence of the experience called ‘co-evolution’. The five semantic themes consist of ‘getting to know new media’, ‘useful but dangerous existence’, ‘sharing roles with Generative AI’, ‘adapting to changes in the learning environment’, and ‘seeking a life that coexists with Generative AI’. The 14 semantic themes consisted of ‘matching up with Generative AI’, ‘creating my own method of using prompts’, ‘limitation of inanimate object’, ‘repeating unnecessary learning activities’, ‘incomplete learning assistant’, ‘my own tutor’, ‘reducing learning time’, ‘setting my own scope of use’, ‘another team member’, ‘passive new media user’, ‘recognition of reality and acceptance of new media’, ‘improving the competence to use Generative AI’, ‘selecting Generative AI according to the purpose of use’, and ‘competition with the human-specific domain’. Conclusions The discussion points on the direction of Generative AI literacy education for university students are as follows. First, it provides education in which prompts can be effectively input. Second, it provides guidelines so that the Generative AI can be used as an auxiliary tool rather than the main tool for learning. Third, it provides education on the characteristics of the Generative AI. Fourth, it enhances education on usage ethics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.20.175
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phenomenological Study on Experience of Using Generative AI by University Students

Dongseong Park, YangJin Noh
Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
article

A Phenomenological Study on Experience of Using Generative AI by University Students

Dongseong Park, YangJin Noh
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to explore the direction of Generative AI literacy education through the exploration of college students' experiences using Generative AI. Methods For this purpose, written and face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 university stu-dents (5 male students and 7 female students) and analyzed by applying Colaizzi's phenomenological method, which consists of seven steps to explore the nature of common experiences rather than the individual participants. Results As a result of analyzing the interview data, 5 semantic themes and 14 sub-themes were derived under the essence of the experience called ‘co-evolution’. The five semantic themes consist of ‘getting to know new media’, ‘useful but dangerous existence’, ‘sharing roles with Generative AI’, ‘adapting to changes in the learning environment’, and ‘seeking a life that coexists with Generative AI’. The 14 semantic themes consisted of ‘matching up with Generative AI’, ‘creating my own method of using prompts’, ‘limitation of inanimate object’, ‘repeating unnecessary learning activities’, ‘incomplete learning assistant’, ‘my own tutor’, ‘reducing learning time’, ‘setting my own scope of use’, ‘another team member’, ‘passive new media user’, ‘recognition of reality and acceptance of new media’, ‘improving the competence to use Generative AI’, ‘selecting Generative AI according to the purpose of use’, and ‘competition with the human-specific domain’. Conclusions The discussion points on the direction of Generative AI literacy education for university students are as follows. First, it provides education in which prompts can be effectively input. Second, it provides guidelines so that the Generative AI can be used as an auxiliary tool rather than the main tool for learning. Third, it provides education on the characteristics of the Generative AI. Fourth, it enhances education on usage ethics.

Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And InstructionVol. 24(20)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.