A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for SMS Spam Detection: CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet Approaches

Spam messages have become a growing challenge in mobile communication, threatening user security and data privacy. Traditional spam detection methods, including rule-based and machine learning techniques, are increasingly insufficient due to the evolving sophistication of spam tactics. This research evaluates the effectiveness of advanced deep learning models such as CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet for SMS spam detection. The dataset used consists of diverse SMS messages labeled as either spam or legitimate (ham), ensuring broad coverage of real-world spam patterns. The study employs a robust ten-fold cross-validation approach to assess the generalization capabilities of the models, measuring performance based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results indicate that ResNet outperformed the other models, achieving an average accuracy of 99.08% and an F1 score of 0.9646, making it the most reliable model for spam detection. CNN-GRU demonstrated competitive performance with a balance between accuracy (98.97%) and computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time applications. CNN-LSTM, while highly accurate (98.92%), showed a slightly lower recall compared to the other models, indicating a more cautious approach to detecting spam. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid deep learning models in addressing the complexities of SMS spam detection. Future research could focus on optimizing these models for deployment in resource-constrained environments, such as mobile devices, and further exploring the integration of residual connections for more effective spam filtering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal Of Computer Networks Architecture and High Performance Computing
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v6i4.4827
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Spam and Phishing Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for SMS Spam Detection: CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet Approaches

Gregorius Airlangga
3 citations
Journal Of Computer Networks Architecture and High Performance Computing
Spam and Phishing Detection
2.34
article

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for SMS Spam Detection: CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet Approaches

Gregorius Airlangga
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Spam messages have become a growing challenge in mobile communication, threatening user security and data privacy. Traditional spam detection methods, including rule-based and machine learning techniques, are increasingly insufficient due to the evolving sophistication of spam tactics. This research evaluates the effectiveness of advanced deep learning models such as CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet for SMS spam detection. The dataset used consists of diverse SMS messages labeled as either spam or legitimate (ham), ensuring broad coverage of real-world spam patterns. The study employs a robust ten-fold cross-validation approach to assess the generalization capabilities of the models, measuring performance based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The results indicate that ResNet outperformed the other models, achieving an average accuracy of 99.08% and an F1 score of 0.9646, making it the most reliable model for spam detection. CNN-GRU demonstrated competitive performance with a balance between accuracy (98.97%) and computational efficiency, making it suitable for real-time applications. CNN-LSTM, while highly accurate (98.92%), showed a slightly lower recall compared to the other models, indicating a more cautious approach to detecting spam. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid deep learning models in addressing the complexities of SMS spam detection. Future research could focus on optimizing these models for deployment in resource-constrained environments, such as mobile devices, and further exploring the integration of residual connections for more effective spam filtering.

Journal Of Computer Networks Architecture and High Performance ComputingVol. 6(4)
Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spam and Phishing Detection
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for SMS Spam Detection: CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and ResNet Approaches — Gregorius Airlangga · Journal Of Computer Networks Architecture and High Performance Computing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS