Impact of China's Accession Protocol on its participation in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism: An analysis of eleven cases involving China's Accession Protocol

It has been twenty-three years since China acceded to the WTO. Since then, China has participated in high-profile disputes through the WTO's DSM. During this period, China has evolved from being a silent observer to a sophisticated participant in the DSM. This has provided a valuable opportunity to observe China's participation in the DSM and to analyse the factors affecting China's performance. This article examines China's engagement in the DSM relating to cases concerning China's Accession Protocol in which China was involved as a respondent. Based on an in-depth analysis of eleven Protocol-related cases settled among all cases pertaining to China's Accession Protocol, I conclude that both the Accession Protocol itself and the interpretive approach adopted by the DSB have made it challenging for China to defend against allegations of violating its obligations under China's Accession Protocol and the associated commitments outlined in China's Working Party Report. WTO Members can consequently without difficulty resort to certain provisions under China's Accession Protocol to bring cases against China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39886
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of China's Accession Protocol on its participation in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism: An analysis of eleven cases involving China's Accession Protocol

Sa Qianyi
1 citations
Heliyon
International Arbitration and Investment Law
0.55
article

Impact of China's Accession Protocol on its participation in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism: An analysis of eleven cases involving China's Accession Protocol

Sa Qianyi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It has been twenty-three years since China acceded to the WTO. Since then, China has participated in high-profile disputes through the WTO's DSM. During this period, China has evolved from being a silent observer to a sophisticated participant in the DSM. This has provided a valuable opportunity to observe China's participation in the DSM and to analyse the factors affecting China's performance. This article examines China's engagement in the DSM relating to cases concerning China's Accession Protocol in which China was involved as a respondent. Based on an in-depth analysis of eleven Protocol-related cases settled among all cases pertaining to China's Accession Protocol, I conclude that both the Accession Protocol itself and the interpretive approach adopted by the DSB have made it challenging for China to defend against allegations of violating its obligations under China's Accession Protocol and the associated commitments outlined in China's Working Party Report. WTO Members can consequently without difficulty resort to certain provisions under China's Accession Protocol to bring cases against China.

HeliyonVol. 11(1)
University of London (GB), International Finance Corporation (KZ), Tianjin Normal University (CN), Durham University (GB), SOAS University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.