Sequential decision-making under uncertainty for long-term energy transition planning

<h2>Summary</h2> Global warming concerns have led to emission regulations and various incentives for low-carbon technologies. Energy system models, which are used to examine how investments affect our ability to meet energy demand, are typically based on two assumptions: key parameters are assumed to be known deterministically and a multi-period energy transition plan is determined at one point in time. We argue that for a systematic generation and analysis of energy transition pathways, these assumptions should be relaxed and, accordingly, we propose methods to achieve that. First, we use stochastic programming (SP) to account for uncertainty in key parameters. Second, we pair SP with a sequential decision-making approach that represents how decisions can be updated as uncertainties unfold. Third, we use simulation-based methods to evaluate the quality of energy transitions. Importantly, we find that accounting for uncertainty, proactively and through feedback, yields pathways with diverse technology portfolios that are resilient to uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111288
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sequential decision-making under uncertainty for long-term energy transition planning

Christos T. Maravelias, Molly A. McDonald
6 citations
iScience
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.25
article

Sequential decision-making under uncertainty for long-term energy transition planning

Christos T. Maravelias, Molly A. McDonald
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<h2>Summary</h2> Global warming concerns have led to emission regulations and various incentives for low-carbon technologies. Energy system models, which are used to examine how investments affect our ability to meet energy demand, are typically based on two assumptions: key parameters are assumed to be known deterministically and a multi-period energy transition plan is determined at one point in time. We argue that for a systematic generation and analysis of energy transition pathways, these assumptions should be relaxed and, accordingly, we propose methods to achieve that. First, we use stochastic programming (SP) to account for uncertainty in key parameters. Second, we pair SP with a sequential decision-making approach that represents how decisions can be updated as uncertainties unfold. Third, we use simulation-based methods to evaluate the quality of energy transitions. Importantly, we find that accounting for uncertainty, proactively and through feedback, yields pathways with diverse technology portfolios that are resilient to uncertainty.

iScienceVol. 27(12)
Princeton University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Princeton University, Office of Science, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Biological and Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sequential decision-making under uncertainty for long-term energy transition planning — Christos T. Maravelias, Molly A. McDonald · iScience (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS