Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand

• Questionnaire-based survey conducted face-to-face at gas stations with EV charging facilities. • Identified and validated seven major BEV adoption barriers using EFA and CFA. • Found ’Vehicle attributes’ as the most significant barrier to BEV adoption. • Provided targeted policy recommendations based on empirical findings. The adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) is pivotal for advancing sustainable transportation and reducing environmental impacts. Despite government efforts, BEV adoption in Thailand remains below expected levels. This study identifies and evaluates the barriers to BEV adoption through a comprehensive survey administered to 3,069 respondents across Thailand. Employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the study categorizes and quantifies these barriers, offering insights into the factors that hinder consumer acceptance of BEVs. The results reveal that ’Vehicle attributes’, including concerns about efficiency, range, and reliability, is the most significant barrier for both BEV and ICE users. However, the order and strength of subsequent barriers differ between these groups. For BEV users, ’Public Data’ and ’Lack of Benefits’ follow as major concerns, while ICE users prioritize ’Financial Barriers’ and ’Consumer Concerns’. Notably, BEV users generally perceive these barriers more strongly across all categories. Based on these findings, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations aimed at addressing these barriers for both current and potential BEV users. Enhancing vehicle attributes characteristics, expanding charging infrastructure, implementing educational campaigns, revising fiscal incentives, and rebranding EVs through effective marketing strategies are critical measures suggested. These interventions are designed to align with both BEV and ICE user expectations and catalyze the broader acceptance and adoption of BEVs in Thailand. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on sustainable transportation but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101264
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand

Thanapong Champahom, Dissakoon Chonsalasin, Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao et al.
9 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.88
article

Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand

Thanapong Champahom, Dissakoon Chonsalasin, Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha, Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, Chayapol Phupatt
article en
9 citations

Abstract

• Questionnaire-based survey conducted face-to-face at gas stations with EV charging facilities. • Identified and validated seven major BEV adoption barriers using EFA and CFA. • Found ’Vehicle attributes’ as the most significant barrier to BEV adoption. • Provided targeted policy recommendations based on empirical findings. The adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) is pivotal for advancing sustainable transportation and reducing environmental impacts. Despite government efforts, BEV adoption in Thailand remains below expected levels. This study identifies and evaluates the barriers to BEV adoption through a comprehensive survey administered to 3,069 respondents across Thailand. Employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the study categorizes and quantifies these barriers, offering insights into the factors that hinder consumer acceptance of BEVs. The results reveal that ’Vehicle attributes’, including concerns about efficiency, range, and reliability, is the most significant barrier for both BEV and ICE users. However, the order and strength of subsequent barriers differ between these groups. For BEV users, ’Public Data’ and ’Lack of Benefits’ follow as major concerns, while ICE users prioritize ’Financial Barriers’ and ’Consumer Concerns’. Notably, BEV users generally perceive these barriers more strongly across all categories. Based on these findings, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations aimed at addressing these barriers for both current and potential BEV users. Enhancing vehicle attributes characteristics, expanding charging infrastructure, implementing educational campaigns, revising fiscal incentives, and rebranding EVs through effective marketing strategies are critical measures suggested. These interventions are designed to align with both BEV and ICE user expectations and catalyze the broader acceptance and adoption of BEVs in Thailand. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on sustainable transportation but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 28
Rajamangala University of Technology Isan (TH), Sripatum University (TH), Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.