AI Robotics in Healthcare Between the EU Medical Device Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act

The growing inclusion of social robots in therapeutic situations raises a variety of unresolved legal and ethical issues, including risks to patient autonomy, human dignity and trust, the potentially life-threatening effects of inaccurate or malfunctioning technology, diminished privacy due to the reliance on enormous amounts of personal (sensitive health) data, new challenges to data security due to the cyber-physical nature of robots, and the problem of how to obtain informed consent to medical treatments based on opaque AI decision making. From this broad spectrum, the article deals with the protection of the health and safety of patients and care recipients under EU law. A more detailed analysis shows that neither the EU’s Medical Device Regulation nor its Artificial Intelligence Act adequately address the risks to patient health and safety that arise in many situations where AI systems are used in the healthcare and nursing sector. Against this backdrop, the article provides recommendations as to which aspects should be regulated in the future and argues for a public discussion about the extent to which we, as a society, should replace human therapists with AI-enabled technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oslo Law Review
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.11.1.2
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Robotics in Healthcare Between the EU Medical Device Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act

Martin Ebers
6 citations
Oslo Law Review
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.72
article

AI Robotics in Healthcare Between the EU Medical Device Regulation and the Artificial Intelligence Act

Martin Ebers
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The growing inclusion of social robots in therapeutic situations raises a variety of unresolved legal and ethical issues, including risks to patient autonomy, human dignity and trust, the potentially life-threatening effects of inaccurate or malfunctioning technology, diminished privacy due to the reliance on enormous amounts of personal (sensitive health) data, new challenges to data security due to the cyber-physical nature of robots, and the problem of how to obtain informed consent to medical treatments based on opaque AI decision making. From this broad spectrum, the article deals with the protection of the health and safety of patients and care recipients under EU law. A more detailed analysis shows that neither the EU’s Medical Device Regulation nor its Artificial Intelligence Act adequately address the risks to patient health and safety that arise in many situations where AI systems are used in the healthcare and nursing sector. Against this backdrop, the article provides recommendations as to which aspects should be regulated in the future and argues for a public discussion about the extent to which we, as a society, should replace human therapists with AI-enabled technology.

Oslo Law ReviewVol. 11(1)
University of Tartu (EE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.