Risk Factor Analysis and Algorithmic Approach for Managing Deep Brain Stimulation Device-Related Wound Complications

Background: Although implanting deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices carries up to a 15% risk of complications, optimal management strategies remain poorly understood. This study aimed to review the risk factors for wound complications of DBS device implantation and develop an algorithm for proper management.Methods: Patients with Parkinson disease who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS device implantation between 2005 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All DBS-related wound complications such as infection, dehiscence, erosion, and displacement were recorded, and factors associated with device explantation were also assessed.Results: A total of 398 patients underwent DBS device implantation using 796 electrodes and implantable pulse generators. During the mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.5 years, 28 patients (7.0%) experienced wound complications that required reoperation, including 14 infection (50.0%), 22 dehiscence (78.6%), five skin erosion (17.9%), and two device displacement (7.1%). Complications were resolved with a single reoperation in 13 patients (46.4%), while nine patients underwent 2–3 surgical procedures (32.2%), and six patients in 6–8 operations (21.4%). The device was salvaged in 16 patients (57.1%) and removed in 12 (42.9%). Infection (P = 0.010), shorter time interval from device implantation to complications (P = 0.022), higher C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.026), methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> growth (P = 0.044), and history of multiple previous revisions (P < 0.001) were associated with device removal.Conclusion: To maximize the therapeutic benefit of DBS and minimize the time, effort, and cost required for revision, temporary explantation in early stages followed by reimplantation of the device after the wound subsides should be considered in high-risk cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wound Management and Research
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22467/jwmr.2024.03062
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factor Analysis and Algorithmic Approach for Managing Deep Brain Stimulation Device-Related Wound Complications

Hyokyung Yoo, Hak Chang, Sun Ha Paek, Junggyo Seo
Journal of Wound Management and Research
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Risk Factor Analysis and Algorithmic Approach for Managing Deep Brain Stimulation Device-Related Wound Complications

Hyokyung Yoo, Hak Chang, Sun Ha Paek, Junggyo Seo
article en

Abstract

Background: Although implanting deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices carries up to a 15% risk of complications, optimal management strategies remain poorly understood. This study aimed to review the risk factors for wound complications of DBS device implantation and develop an algorithm for proper management.Methods: Patients with Parkinson disease who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS device implantation between 2005 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All DBS-related wound complications such as infection, dehiscence, erosion, and displacement were recorded, and factors associated with device explantation were also assessed.Results: A total of 398 patients underwent DBS device implantation using 796 electrodes and implantable pulse generators. During the mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 5.5 years, 28 patients (7.0%) experienced wound complications that required reoperation, including 14 infection (50.0%), 22 dehiscence (78.6%), five skin erosion (17.9%), and two device displacement (7.1%). Complications were resolved with a single reoperation in 13 patients (46.4%), while nine patients underwent 2–3 surgical procedures (32.2%), and six patients in 6–8 operations (21.4%). The device was salvaged in 16 patients (57.1%) and removed in 12 (42.9%). Infection (P = 0.010), shorter time interval from device implantation to complications (P = 0.022), higher C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.026), methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> growth (P = 0.044), and history of multiple previous revisions (P < 0.001) were associated with device removal.Conclusion: To maximize the therapeutic benefit of DBS and minimize the time, effort, and cost required for revision, temporary explantation in early stages followed by reimplantation of the device after the wound subsides should be considered in high-risk cases.

Journal of Wound Management and ResearchVol. 20(3)
Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.