Philip Glahn and Cary Levine, <i>The Future Is Present: Art, Technology, and the Work of Mobile Image</i> Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2024. Pp. 336. ISBN 978-0-262-54807-6. $45.00 (paperback).

In the mid-1960s, a colourful palette of art-and-technology projects burst forth from corporate laboratories, artists' lofts and museum galleries.This aesthetic explosion was catalysed by money, media exposure and the creative energies of engineers and artists alike.For some participants, it was a short, tumultuous affair.For others, these interactions left indelible marks on their professional lives.Then, after less than a decade of highly visible and expensive efforts, this wave of art-and-technology activity appeared to retreat.Critics attacked interdisciplinary partnerships as an aesthetic disappointment that had somehow sullied the art world.A related gripe was ontologicalwhat exactly were these partnerships producing?Sure, it was interesting, but was it really art? (Such debates persist today around artworks produced via artificial intelligence.)Finally, and perhaps most damning, critics attacked artists for compromising themselves ethically by collaborating with engineers, using military-derived technology and accepting corporate patronage.By the mid-1970s, the art-and-technology movement appeared as out of fashion as moon landings and other techno-utopian projects launched in the mid-1960s.This abeyance proved temporary, however.This is where Philip Glahn and Cary Levine, two professors of art history/theory, pick up the story.The Future Is Present examines the activities of Mobile Image, a two-person art collective founded in 1977.More specifically, Glahn and Levine focus on three works made by Mobile Image's two members, Kit Galloway (b.1948) and Sherrie Rabinowitz (1950-2013).Satellite Arts (The Image as Place) was made in 1977 in collaboration with the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA).It featured a 'bidirectional link' enabled by a communications satellite which fostered artistic experimentation 'between two groups of dancers and technicians' (p.45) separated by thousands of miles.Three years later, Mobile Image unveiled Hole in Space (A Public Communication Sculpture) where two large screens in New York City and Los Angeles, linked by satellite, enabled members of the public to see and interact with another as part of a 'globally distributed electronic commons' (p.119).Finally, in 1984, Electronic Caf linked members of the public across several different neighborhoods in Los Angeles to form a 'telecollaborative network'.Glahn and Levine describe their book as a 'critical history' of Mobile Image, using the three aforementioned works to make 'an argument for the historical importance' of the art collective (pp. 1, 3).Despite these claims, their book works better when seen as a close reading, grounded in art criticism, of these three particular instantiations of new-media artworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal for the History of Science
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087424000943
Primary Topic
Photography and Visual Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philip Glahn and Cary Levine, The Future Is Present: Art, Technology, and the Work of Mobile Image Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2024. Pp. 336. ISBN 978-0-262-54807-6. $45.00 (paperback).

W. Patrick McCray
The British Journal for the History of Science
Photography and Visual Culture
article

Philip Glahn and Cary Levine, The Future Is Present: Art, Technology, and the Work of Mobile Image Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2024. Pp. 336. ISBN 978-0-262-54807-6. $45.00 (paperback).

W. Patrick McCray
article en

Abstract

In the mid-1960s, a colourful palette of art-and-technology projects burst forth from corporate laboratories, artists' lofts and museum galleries.This aesthetic explosion was catalysed by money, media exposure and the creative energies of engineers and artists alike.For some participants, it was a short, tumultuous affair.For others, these interactions left indelible marks on their professional lives.Then, after less than a decade of highly visible and expensive efforts, this wave of art-and-technology activity appeared to retreat.Critics attacked interdisciplinary partnerships as an aesthetic disappointment that had somehow sullied the art world.A related gripe was ontologicalwhat exactly were these partnerships producing?Sure, it was interesting, but was it really art? (Such debates persist today around artworks produced via artificial intelligence.)Finally, and perhaps most damning, critics attacked artists for compromising themselves ethically by collaborating with engineers, using military-derived technology and accepting corporate patronage.By the mid-1970s, the art-and-technology movement appeared as out of fashion as moon landings and other techno-utopian projects launched in the mid-1960s.This abeyance proved temporary, however.This is where Philip Glahn and Cary Levine, two professors of art history/theory, pick up the story.The Future Is Present examines the activities of Mobile Image, a two-person art collective founded in 1977.More specifically, Glahn and Levine focus on three works made by Mobile Image's two members, Kit Galloway (b.1948) and Sherrie Rabinowitz (1950-2013).Satellite Arts (The Image as Place) was made in 1977 in collaboration with the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA).It featured a 'bidirectional link' enabled by a communications satellite which fostered artistic experimentation 'between two groups of dancers and technicians' (p.45) separated by thousands of miles.Three years later, Mobile Image unveiled Hole in Space (A Public Communication Sculpture) where two large screens in New York City and Los Angeles, linked by satellite, enabled members of the public to see and interact with another as part of a 'globally distributed electronic commons' (p.119).Finally, in 1984, Electronic Caf linked members of the public across several different neighborhoods in Los Angeles to form a 'telecollaborative network'.Glahn and Levine describe their book as a 'critical history' of Mobile Image, using the three aforementioned works to make 'an argument for the historical importance' of the art collective (pp. 1, 3).Despite these claims, their book works better when seen as a close reading, grounded in art criticism, of these three particular instantiations of new-media artworks.

The British Journal for the History of ScienceVol. 58(1)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Photography and Visual Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.