A leader I can(not) trust: understanding the path from epistemic trust to political leader choices via dogmatism

There is growing concern about the impact of declining political trust on democracies. Psychological research has introduced the concept of epistemic (mis)trust as a stable disposition acquired through development, which may influence our sociopolitical engagement. Given trust's prominence in current politics, we examined the relationship between epistemic trust and people's choices of (un)trustworthy political leaders. In two representative samples in the UK and US (<i>N</i> = 1096), we tested whether epistemic trust predicts political leader choices through three political dimensions: dogmatism, political trust, and ideology. Although epistemic trust did not directly predict choices of political leaders, it predicted dogmatism and political ideology, which in turn predicted choices of political leaders. A network analysis revealed that epistemic trust and political dimensions only interact through their common connection with dogmatism. These findings suggest that cognitive and affective development may underlie an individual's political ideology and associated beliefs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and the Life Sciences
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2024.11
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A leader I can(not) trust: understanding the path from epistemic trust to political leader choices via dogmatism

Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Chloë Campbell, Mariana Von Mohr, Kobi Hackenburg et al.
2 citations
Politics and the Life Sciences
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
article

A leader I can(not) trust: understanding the path from epistemic trust to political leader choices via dogmatism

Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Chloë Campbell, Mariana Von Mohr, Kobi Hackenburg, Manos Tsakiris, Michal Tanzer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There is growing concern about the impact of declining political trust on democracies. Psychological research has introduced the concept of epistemic (mis)trust as a stable disposition acquired through development, which may influence our sociopolitical engagement. Given trust's prominence in current politics, we examined the relationship between epistemic trust and people's choices of (un)trustworthy political leaders. In two representative samples in the UK and US (<i>N</i> = 1096), we tested whether epistemic trust predicts political leader choices through three political dimensions: dogmatism, political trust, and ideology. Although epistemic trust did not directly predict choices of political leaders, it predicted dogmatism and political ideology, which in turn predicted choices of political leaders. A network analysis revealed that epistemic trust and political dimensions only interact through their common connection with dogmatism. These findings suggest that cognitive and affective development may underlie an individual's political ideology and associated beliefs.

Politics and the Life SciencesVol. 44(1)
University of London (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), School of Advanced Study (GB), University College London (GB)
NOMIS Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.