Effect of Unimanual Versus Bimanual Training on Impairment, Disability and Quality of Life Among Post Stroke Individuals: A Comparative Study

Background: Stroke is a significant global health issue caused by sudden interruptions in blood flow to the brain, leading to neurological dysfunction that can result in ischemic or hemorrhagic conditions. Effective rehabilitation approaches, such as unilateral and bilateral training, play a vital role in restoring upper limb function and overall recovery through targeted neural adaptations. Evaluation tools like the (SIS) provide critical insights into post-stroke recovery and improvements in quality of life, underscoring the need for comprehensive care and early intervention in managing this complex medical condition. Aim: To find out the effectiveness of unimanual and bimanual training on impairment, disability, and quality of life among post stroke individuals. Study design: comparative study Method: Firstly, ethical clearance was taken from the committee for comparative study. Samples were collected by lottery allotment sampling method. Thirty participants were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The details of the treatment were explained and written consent was taken from the participants. Experimental group treated with unimanual training and bimanual training for 5 days a week for 4 weeks. Outcome measure: Stroke impact scale Results: Data was analysed using SPSS Version29. According to statistical analysis, improvement seen in group B compared to group A. Conclusions: Bimanual training showed greater effective in impairment, disability and quality of life compared to unimanual training. KEYWORDS: Bimanual training, Unimanual training, stroke impact scale, quality of life, stroke.