Creative performance in professional advertising development: The role of ideation templates, consumer insight, and intrinsic motivation

Abstract To develop more creative advertising, scholars advocate ideation techniques and one of the most strongly supported is the Templates method. This research explores the efficacy of Templates, and evaluates its effectiveness compared to other creative ideation approaches. Two studies are presented. One directly asks professional advertising creatives to use specific Templates to develop advertisements. The other determines if the mere knowledge of the Templates method improves creative ideation. In both studies, industry-based judges assess the quality of respondents’ work. The Templates approach improves the originality of advertising, with no detrimental influence on strategy. Two alternative approaches to enhancing creativity were compared against Templates: 1) providing better domain knowledge through consumer insight and 2) improving the intrinsic motivation of creatives. The research shows these two alternatives both improve originality yet reduce how “on strategy” the advertising is—a trade-off effect. However, the Templates method does not suffer from this trade-off and performs well, by improving originality without any detriment on strategic focus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01063-4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creative performance in professional advertising development: The role of ideation templates, consumer insight, and intrinsic motivation

Lawrence Ang, Scott Koslow, John Parker, Alexander Tevi
5 citations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.54
article

Creative performance in professional advertising development: The role of ideation templates, consumer insight, and intrinsic motivation

Lawrence Ang, Scott Koslow, John Parker, Alexander Tevi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract To develop more creative advertising, scholars advocate ideation techniques and one of the most strongly supported is the Templates method. This research explores the efficacy of Templates, and evaluates its effectiveness compared to other creative ideation approaches. Two studies are presented. One directly asks professional advertising creatives to use specific Templates to develop advertisements. The other determines if the mere knowledge of the Templates method improves creative ideation. In both studies, industry-based judges assess the quality of respondents’ work. The Templates approach improves the originality of advertising, with no detrimental influence on strategy. Two alternative approaches to enhancing creativity were compared against Templates: 1) providing better domain knowledge through consumer insight and 2) improving the intrinsic motivation of creatives. The research shows these two alternatives both improve originality yet reduce how “on strategy” the advertising is—a trade-off effect. However, the Templates method does not suffer from this trade-off and performs well, by improving originality without any detriment on strategic focus.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceVol. 53(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), Newcastle University (GB), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.