Does Law 14874, A New Ethical Regulation of Research with Human Beings in Brazil, Violate Human Rights?

Free, post-study and indefinite access to the best prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic method that has been demonstrated to be effective during the study is a fundamental condition for protecting research participants. Since its inception in ethical regulations for research with human beings, Brazil has made this condition a cornerstone of protection for study participants. Through a qualitative analysis of Chapter VI of Law 14874, a new Law that regulates research with human beings in Brazil it was possible to perceive that there was a regression in the protection and recognition of the fundamental rights and dignity of the human beings participating in the research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i26.y2024.008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Law 14874, A New Ethical Regulation of Research with Human Beings in Brazil, Violate Human Rights?

Ricardo Zanetti Gomes, Carlos Santos
1 citations
Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Does Law 14874, A New Ethical Regulation of Research with Human Beings in Brazil, Violate Human Rights?

Ricardo Zanetti Gomes, Carlos Santos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Free, post-study and indefinite access to the best prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic method that has been demonstrated to be effective during the study is a fundamental condition for protecting research participants. Since its inception in ethical regulations for research with human beings, Brazil has made this condition a cornerstone of protection for study participants. Through a qualitative analysis of Chapter VI of Law 14874, a new Law that regulates research with human beings in Brazil it was possible to perceive that there was a regression in the protection and recognition of the fundamental rights and dignity of the human beings participating in the research.

Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética(26)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.