Comparison Performance Analysis of HDD, SSD and NVME for OLTP Database Server

Databases are an essential component of life in modern society. The database has become an online Transaction Processing (OLTP) operational support company. This study discusses the storage configuration in a virtual server database for OLTP Database with a benchmark against three storage configurations for four databases: SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB for Windows Server virtualization. Benchmarks using TPC-C to get the best performance from all three configurations have been tested. The results of this study show that the storage configuration of HDD as a virtual disk drive OS and NVME as a virtual disk drive database get better performance as online transaction processing (OLTP) compared to HDD as a virtual disk drive OS and HDD or SSD as a virtual disk drive database. Using the TPC-C benchmark, the study tested the performance of four databases (SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB) in various virtual storage configurations. The results of 36 experiments involving different numbers of virtual users (10, 50, and 100) showed that a hybrid configuration that used HDDs for the operating system and NVME for database storage provided the best performance. On SQL Server, SSD configurations show better results for smaller user loads. The results suggest that the combination of HDD and NVME is the optimal configuration for most databases in OLTP tasks, and it provides useful guidance in efficient storage investment decision-making. Further research is expected to be able to conduct tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i10.1730
Primary Topic
Caching and Content Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Performance Analysis of HDD, SSD and NVME for OLTP Database Server

Ferdy Nirwansyah
Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Caching and Content Delivery
article

Comparison Performance Analysis of HDD, SSD and NVME for OLTP Database Server

Ferdy Nirwansyah
article en

Abstract

Databases are an essential component of life in modern society. The database has become an online Transaction Processing (OLTP) operational support company. This study discusses the storage configuration in a virtual server database for OLTP Database with a benchmark against three storage configurations for four databases: SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB for Windows Server virtualization. Benchmarks using TPC-C to get the best performance from all three configurations have been tested. The results of this study show that the storage configuration of HDD as a virtual disk drive OS and NVME as a virtual disk drive database get better performance as online transaction processing (OLTP) compared to HDD as a virtual disk drive OS and HDD or SSD as a virtual disk drive database. Using the TPC-C benchmark, the study tested the performance of four databases (SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB) in various virtual storage configurations. The results of 36 experiments involving different numbers of virtual users (10, 50, and 100) showed that a hybrid configuration that used HDDs for the operating system and NVME for database storage provided the best performance. On SQL Server, SSD configurations show better results for smaller user loads. The results suggest that the combination of HDD and NVME is the optimal configuration for most databases in OLTP tasks, and it provides useful guidance in efficient storage investment decision-making. Further research is expected to be able to conduct tests.

Jurnal Syntax AdmirationVol. 5(10)
Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Caching and Content Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.