Comparing methods for risk prediction of multicategory outcomes: dichotomized logistic regression vs. multinomial logit regression

Estimating multiple logistic regression models of dichotomized outcomes may result in poorly calibrated predictions for an outcome with multiple ordinal categories. Multinomial continuation-ratio logit regression produces better calibrated predictions, constrains the sum of predicted probabilities to 100%, and has the advantages of simplicity in model interpretation, flexibility to include outcome category-specific predictors and random-effect terms for patient heterogeneity by hospital. It also accounts for mutual dependence among multiple categories and accommodates competing risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02389-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing methods for risk prediction of multicategory outcomes: dichotomized logistic regression vs. multinomial logit regression

Abhik Das, Matthew A. Rysavy, Georgiy Bobashev, Lei Li
5 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
1.74
article

Comparing methods for risk prediction of multicategory outcomes: dichotomized logistic regression vs. multinomial logit regression

Abhik Das, Matthew A. Rysavy, Georgiy Bobashev, Lei Li
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Estimating multiple logistic regression models of dichotomized outcomes may result in poorly calibrated predictions for an outcome with multiple ordinal categories. Multinomial continuation-ratio logit regression produces better calibrated predictions, constrains the sum of predicted probabilities to 100%, and has the advantages of simplicity in model interpretation, flexibility to include outcome category-specific predictors and random-effect terms for patient heterogeneity by hospital. It also accounts for mutual dependence among multiple categories and accommodates competing risks.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 24(1)
RTI International (US), Center for Clinical Research (United States) (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.