Mapping of soil erosion risk in Ezeagu Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria

This study centres on mapping soil erosion risk in Ezeagu Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria. A multi-criteria research design was adopted in carrying out this study by using remote sensed images, topographic, soil and rainfall data. K Factor, R Factor, P Factor, K Factor and Digital Elevation Model were generated. SWAT model was used to generate surface runoff and sediment yield and AHP model were used to identify and map levels of soil erosion risk in the study area. Loamy sandy soil with a K Factor value of 0.23 – 0.34 (t h MJ-1 mm-1) and loam soil with a K factor Value of 0.08 – 0.14 (t h MJ-1 mm-1) dominates the study area. The organic matter contents for all the soils were rated low with an average measured organic matter of 0.97 (%). The rainfall erosivity factor (R-factor) results showed variations across the study area from 1029.295 to 1343.092, 1343.092 to 1589.713, 1589.713 to 1744.922, 1744.922 to 1965.777, and 1965.777 to 2060.864 MJ mm ha year-1, h-1 year-1. Areas with dense vegetation had lower P-factors indicating better protection against erosion, while areas under cultivation, especially those with poor management practices and without cover crops show higher P-factors. Almost all the area has a moderate (0.5-0.6) C factor which means moderate protection, areas with higher protection (0.6-1) C factor occupied a small portion towards the east while patches of low C factors are found scattered in the north, west northwest, south and eastern part of the study area. The eastern part of the study area are more susceptible to soil erosion with value ranging from 3.2-5.8, 5.9-9.9 and 10.0-19. Slope steepness and slope length is lower in the northern, western and south-west of the study area. Areas with annual soil loss between 0 to 10 grams, 10 to 20 grams and 30 to 40 grams dominates the northern, western and southern parts of the study area. The erosion risk map depicts that very low-risk area coverage of 24.06%, low risk covers 20.29%, moderate risk occupies 17.75% and high risk erosion risk covers 21.30% while very high risk occupies 16.61% of the total area. This study recommends terracing and gabions in areas identified at risk of erosion, promotion and adoption of agronomic soil conservation methods of mulching, cover cropping and planting plants to enhance soil stability and reduce erosion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v10i3a.20
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping of soil erosion risk in Ezeagu Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria

Tochukwu Ikediashi, S. Ishaya, Francisca N. Onyia
1 citations
Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
0.28
article

Mapping of soil erosion risk in Ezeagu Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria

Tochukwu Ikediashi, S. Ishaya, Francisca N. Onyia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study centres on mapping soil erosion risk in Ezeagu Local Government Area of Enugu State, Nigeria. A multi-criteria research design was adopted in carrying out this study by using remote sensed images, topographic, soil and rainfall data. K Factor, R Factor, P Factor, K Factor and Digital Elevation Model were generated. SWAT model was used to generate surface runoff and sediment yield and AHP model were used to identify and map levels of soil erosion risk in the study area. Loamy sandy soil with a K Factor value of 0.23 – 0.34 (t h MJ-1 mm-1) and loam soil with a K factor Value of 0.08 – 0.14 (t h MJ-1 mm-1) dominates the study area. The organic matter contents for all the soils were rated low with an average measured organic matter of 0.97 (%). The rainfall erosivity factor (R-factor) results showed variations across the study area from 1029.295 to 1343.092, 1343.092 to 1589.713, 1589.713 to 1744.922, 1744.922 to 1965.777, and 1965.777 to 2060.864 MJ mm ha year-1, h-1 year-1. Areas with dense vegetation had lower P-factors indicating better protection against erosion, while areas under cultivation, especially those with poor management practices and without cover crops show higher P-factors. Almost all the area has a moderate (0.5-0.6) C factor which means moderate protection, areas with higher protection (0.6-1) C factor occupied a small portion towards the east while patches of low C factors are found scattered in the north, west northwest, south and eastern part of the study area. The eastern part of the study area are more susceptible to soil erosion with value ranging from 3.2-5.8, 5.9-9.9 and 10.0-19. Slope steepness and slope length is lower in the northern, western and south-west of the study area. Areas with annual soil loss between 0 to 10 grams, 10 to 20 grams and 30 to 40 grams dominates the northern, western and southern parts of the study area. The erosion risk map depicts that very low-risk area coverage of 24.06%, low risk covers 20.29%, moderate risk occupies 17.75% and high risk erosion risk covers 21.30% while very high risk occupies 16.61% of the total area. This study recommends terracing and gabions in areas identified at risk of erosion, promotion and adoption of agronomic soil conservation methods of mulching, cover cropping and planting plants to enhance soil stability and reduce erosion.

Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied SciencesVol. 10(3a)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.