Entrepreneurial finance and sustainability: Do institutional investors impact the ESG performance of SMEs?

Institutional investors improve the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Our difference-in-differences framework shows that the backing from private equity and venture capital funds leads to an increase in SMEs’ externally validated ESG scores compared to their matched non-investor-backed peers. Consistent with “ESG-as-insurance” theory, the ESG performance of SMEs with a higher probability of failure is more likely to benefit from the backing of institutional investors. This positive effect is heterogeneous; while SMEs with high ex-ante ESG performance further improve their ESG performance following institutional investor backing, SMEs with low ex-ante ESG performance are unlikely to implement any improvements. Entrepreneurial finance seems to help sustainable entrepreneurs transform into “sustainability champions,” while neglecting the betterment of non-sustainable SMEs. • We employ a difference-in-differences framework to identify the causal effect of institutional investors on portfolio firms' ESG performance. • Venture capital and private equity funds improve small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs)’ ESG performance, consistent with delegated philanthropy theory. • Institutional investors improve ESG performance more in SMEs with a higher risk of failure, consistent with sustainability-as-insurance theory. • The positive effect of institutional investor backing on ESG performance is mainly driven by SMEs with pronounced pre-backing ESG orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00498
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entrepreneurial finance and sustainability: Do institutional investors impact the ESG performance of SMEs?

Wolfgang Drobetz, Omrane Guedhami, Paul P. Momtaz, Sadok El Ghoul et al.
16 citations
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.87
article

Entrepreneurial finance and sustainability: Do institutional investors impact the ESG performance of SMEs?

Wolfgang Drobetz, Omrane Guedhami, Paul P. Momtaz, Sadok El Ghoul, Jan P. Hackmann
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Institutional investors improve the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Our difference-in-differences framework shows that the backing from private equity and venture capital funds leads to an increase in SMEs’ externally validated ESG scores compared to their matched non-investor-backed peers. Consistent with “ESG-as-insurance” theory, the ESG performance of SMEs with a higher probability of failure is more likely to benefit from the backing of institutional investors. This positive effect is heterogeneous; while SMEs with high ex-ante ESG performance further improve their ESG performance following institutional investor backing, SMEs with low ex-ante ESG performance are unlikely to implement any improvements. Entrepreneurial finance seems to help sustainable entrepreneurs transform into “sustainability champions,” while neglecting the betterment of non-sustainable SMEs. • We employ a difference-in-differences framework to identify the causal effect of institutional investors on portfolio firms' ESG performance. • Venture capital and private equity funds improve small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs)’ ESG performance, consistent with delegated philanthropy theory. • Institutional investors improve ESG performance more in SMEs with a higher risk of failure, consistent with sustainability-as-insurance theory. • The positive effect of institutional investor backing on ESG performance is mainly driven by SMEs with pronounced pre-backing ESG orientation.

Journal of Business Venturing InsightsVol. 22
University of Alberta (CA), University of South Carolina (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Syracuse University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.