Acknowledging the dual-interest gestationalist approach

Lange argues that the gestationalist approach to moral parenthood fails due to its implausible reliance on a 'valuable intimate personal relationship between newborn and gestational procreator' at birth.However, his dismissal of the moral significance of the maternal-foetal connection depends largely upon inappropriate analogies to other forms of relationship.Further, Lange targets a very specific framing of the gestationalist view, overlooking the significance that many gestationalist accounts grant to maternal interests and experiences.Finally -perhaps due to this asymmetric focus -the version of the Harm Argument with which he engages also fails to recognise as morally significant the harm of forced separation for parents (and especially gestational mothers).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110372
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acknowledging the dual-interest gestationalist approach

Teresa Baron
1 citations
Journal of Medical Ethics
Reproductive Health and Technologies
0.54
article

Acknowledging the dual-interest gestationalist approach

Teresa Baron
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lange argues that the gestationalist approach to moral parenthood fails due to its implausible reliance on a 'valuable intimate personal relationship between newborn and gestational procreator' at birth.However, his dismissal of the moral significance of the maternal-foetal connection depends largely upon inappropriate analogies to other forms of relationship.Further, Lange targets a very specific framing of the gestationalist view, overlooking the significance that many gestationalist accounts grant to maternal interests and experiences.Finally -perhaps due to this asymmetric focus -the version of the Harm Argument with which he engages also fails to recognise as morally significant the harm of forced separation for parents (and especially gestational mothers).

Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 51(2)
University of Nottingham (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.