Regenerative management effects on pasture production: initial data from a dryland farmlet experiment

Regenerative agriculture (RA) is becoming more widely recognised in New Zealand (NZ) agriculture. It is claimed to increase productivity and improve landscape function. However, in an NZ context, there is a lack of quantifiable data in terms of productivity. To determine the feasibility of RA in terms of DM production, the total yield and botanical composition of two 4x4 Latin squares were measured. The four treatments were high and low fertility conventional (HC and LC) and high and low fertility regenerative (HR and LR). The R pastures were sown in a 12-species pasture mix and the C pastures were sown in Medicago sativa (lucerne). This paper focuses on the first 18 months of this experiment on Latin squares one and two. In the first season (June 2022 – June 2023), total yield was lower for regenerative (R) than conventional (C) treatments at an average of 8,660 and 10,380 kg DM/ha, respectively. This trend was reflected by growth rates where C had a higher mean growth rate of 34 compared to 30 kg DM/ha/day in the R treatment. Over the entire 18-month period weeds comprised 7% of yield for L compared with 14% for H. The average legume yield of both systems of the L pasture was 11 t DM/ha compared to the H treatments at only 9 t DM/ha. The results of this experiment will provide quantifiable data for farmers to make informed decisions about the implementation of RA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2024.86.3689
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regenerative management effects on pasture production: initial data from a dryland farmlet experiment

Kenneth S. Watson, James Moir, Alistair Black
2 citations
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Bioenergy crop production and management
1.14
article

Regenerative management effects on pasture production: initial data from a dryland farmlet experiment

Kenneth S. Watson, James Moir, Alistair Black
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Regenerative agriculture (RA) is becoming more widely recognised in New Zealand (NZ) agriculture. It is claimed to increase productivity and improve landscape function. However, in an NZ context, there is a lack of quantifiable data in terms of productivity. To determine the feasibility of RA in terms of DM production, the total yield and botanical composition of two 4x4 Latin squares were measured. The four treatments were high and low fertility conventional (HC and LC) and high and low fertility regenerative (HR and LR). The R pastures were sown in a 12-species pasture mix and the C pastures were sown in Medicago sativa (lucerne). This paper focuses on the first 18 months of this experiment on Latin squares one and two. In the first season (June 2022 – June 2023), total yield was lower for regenerative (R) than conventional (C) treatments at an average of 8,660 and 10,380 kg DM/ha, respectively. This trend was reflected by growth rates where C had a higher mean growth rate of 34 compared to 30 kg DM/ha/day in the R treatment. Over the entire 18-month period weeds comprised 7% of yield for L compared with 14% for H. The average legume yield of both systems of the L pasture was 11 t DM/ha compared to the H treatments at only 9 t DM/ha. The results of this experiment will provide quantifiable data for farmers to make informed decisions about the implementation of RA.

Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Lincoln University (NZ), Lincoln University - Pennsylvania (US)
AgResearch, Massey University, Fertiliser Association of New Zealand
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Bioenergy crop production and management
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.