Integrating Youth Perspectives into the Design of AI-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments

This study highlights how middle schoolers discuss the benefits and drawbacks of AI-driven conversational agents in learning. Using thematic analysis of focus groups, we identified five themes in students’ views of AI applications in education. Students recognized the benefits of AI in making learning more engaging and providing personalized, adaptable scaffolding. They emphasized that AI use in education needs to be safe and equitable. Students identified the potential of AI in supporting teachers and noted that AI educational agents fall short when compared to emotionally and intellectually complex humans. Overall, we argue that even without technical expertise, middle schoolers can articulate deep, multifaceted understandings of the possibilities and pitfalls of AI in education. Centering student voices in AI design can also provide learners with much-desired agency over their future learning experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111197
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Youth Perspectives into the Design of AI-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments

Megan Humburg, Krista Glazewski, Dalila Dragnić-Cindrić, Cindy E. Hmelo‐Silver et al.
4 citations
Education Sciences
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.65
article

Integrating Youth Perspectives into the Design of AI-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments

Megan Humburg, Krista Glazewski, Dalila Dragnić-Cindrić, Cindy E. Hmelo‐Silver, James C. Lester, Joshua Danish
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study highlights how middle schoolers discuss the benefits and drawbacks of AI-driven conversational agents in learning. Using thematic analysis of focus groups, we identified five themes in students’ views of AI applications in education. Students recognized the benefits of AI in making learning more engaging and providing personalized, adaptable scaffolding. They emphasized that AI use in education needs to be safe and equitable. Students identified the potential of AI in supporting teachers and noted that AI educational agents fall short when compared to emotionally and intellectually complex humans. Overall, we argue that even without technical expertise, middle schoolers can articulate deep, multifaceted understandings of the possibilities and pitfalls of AI in education. Centering student voices in AI design can also provide learners with much-desired agency over their future learning experiences.

Education SciencesVol. 14(11)
North Carolina State University (US), Digital Promise (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Institute for Learning Innovation (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Teaching and Learning Programming
1.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.