Driving factors of variation in fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency in maize cropping systems across China and its microbial mechanism

• Fertilizer N recovery efficiency (FNRE) in maize varies among different soils. • Soil pH and organic matter drive variations in maize FNRE. • Optimal soil pH for maize FNRE is around 6.50–6.62. • Optimal soil organic matter for maize FNRE is around 35.25–46.90 g kg −1 . • Soil dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium contributes to maize FNRE. Maize ( Zea mays L.) fertilizer nitrogen (N) recovery efficiency (FNRE) shows regional differences in China, and is more strongly affected by soil properties than by climate. However, how soil factors regulate maize FNRE is poorly understood. Herein, 15 N tracer pot experiments combined with absolute microbial quantification sequencing were conducted using eight soils covering the main maize cropping systems from northern to southern China. The aim was to elucidate which soil factors affect maize FNRE and identify their optimal range for maximizing FNRE while minimizing N loss. Our results show that soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and clay and sand contents were the key factors affecting maize biomass and FNRE across the eight tested soils. Maize biomass and FNRE had parabolic relationships with soil pH, SOM, clay, and sand contents, whereas N loss displayed the opposite trend. The highest maize biomass and FNRE and lowest fertilizer N loss were in the soils with pH of 6.50–6.62, SOM level of 35.25–46.90 g kg −1 , clay content of 41.12 %–44.42 %, and sand content of 17.71 %–23.41 %. Under these soil conditions, maize growth and soil N retention capabilities exhibited a high degree of coordination. Bacterial communities differed significantly among the soils, sharing the same soil drivers as maize biomass and FNRE. The abundance of N cycling genes ( nasA , narI , narJ , nrfA, and nrfB ) involved in dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) was positively correlated with FNRE and negatively correlated with fertilizer N loss, suggesting that DNRA may contribute to soil N retention and enhance FNRE by affecting substrates for nitrification and denitrification. Our study demonstrates that soil pH, SOM, and texture are three key factors driving FNRE variation in maize cropping systems across China, and high microbial-driven DNRA may account for maximum maize FNRE. These findings highlight the importance of tailored FNRE enhancement strategies based on soil characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117083
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving factors of variation in fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency in maize cropping systems across China and its microbial mechanism

Xue Qiang Zhao, Xun Xiao, Ren Fang Shen, Yuekai Wang et al.
5 citations
Geoderma
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.67
article

Driving factors of variation in fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency in maize cropping systems across China and its microbial mechanism

Xue Qiang Zhao, Xun Xiao, Ren Fang Shen, Yuekai Wang, Zubin Xie, Fahui Jiang, Kailou Liu, W. H. Dai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Fertilizer N recovery efficiency (FNRE) in maize varies among different soils. • Soil pH and organic matter drive variations in maize FNRE. • Optimal soil pH for maize FNRE is around 6.50–6.62. • Optimal soil organic matter for maize FNRE is around 35.25–46.90 g kg −1 . • Soil dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium contributes to maize FNRE. Maize ( Zea mays L.) fertilizer nitrogen (N) recovery efficiency (FNRE) shows regional differences in China, and is more strongly affected by soil properties than by climate. However, how soil factors regulate maize FNRE is poorly understood. Herein, 15 N tracer pot experiments combined with absolute microbial quantification sequencing were conducted using eight soils covering the main maize cropping systems from northern to southern China. The aim was to elucidate which soil factors affect maize FNRE and identify their optimal range for maximizing FNRE while minimizing N loss. Our results show that soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and clay and sand contents were the key factors affecting maize biomass and FNRE across the eight tested soils. Maize biomass and FNRE had parabolic relationships with soil pH, SOM, clay, and sand contents, whereas N loss displayed the opposite trend. The highest maize biomass and FNRE and lowest fertilizer N loss were in the soils with pH of 6.50–6.62, SOM level of 35.25–46.90 g kg −1 , clay content of 41.12 %–44.42 %, and sand content of 17.71 %–23.41 %. Under these soil conditions, maize growth and soil N retention capabilities exhibited a high degree of coordination. Bacterial communities differed significantly among the soils, sharing the same soil drivers as maize biomass and FNRE. The abundance of N cycling genes ( nasA , narI , narJ , nrfA, and nrfB ) involved in dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) was positively correlated with FNRE and negatively correlated with fertilizer N loss, suggesting that DNRA may contribute to soil N retention and enhance FNRE by affecting substrates for nitrification and denitrification. Our study demonstrates that soil pH, SOM, and texture are three key factors driving FNRE variation in maize cropping systems across China, and high microbial-driven DNRA may account for maximum maize FNRE. These findings highlight the importance of tailored FNRE enhancement strategies based on soil characteristics.

GeodermaVol. 451
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Soil Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.