Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer

Objective: To compare the Intraocular Pressure measured by the Goldmann Applanation tonometer with by iCare ic100 tonometer in normal human eye to determine the accuracy and reliability of both methods. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Ophthalmology Department, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta Pakistan, from Oct 2022 to Apr 2023. Methodology: Approval was secured prior to enrolling every individual, protecting their privacy throughout the process. All instruments adhered to the manufacturer's guidelines for calibration. A single ophthalmologist assessed the intraocular pressure of all participants. In our study we included 400 eyes (200 right and 200 left) among 200 patients. Initially, study eyes were inspected using a slit lamp. Subsequently, iCare tonometer and Goldman applanation tonometer were employed to gauge the intraocular pressure. Results: Out of 200, 87 patients (43.5%) were male and 113(56.5%) were females. Median age of the patients was 51.00(45-58) years range from 22-77 years. Mean IOP measured by iCare was 19.01±7.86 mmHg and by Goldman applanation tonomter was 20.14±8.15 mmHg. The correlation coefficient value between the readings of two instruments was r=0.866 with significant p value (p< 0.001). Conclusion: The iCare ic100 consistently provides high intraocular pressure measurements (2-3mmHg) compared to the Goldmann Applanation tonometer across various sub Groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i5.11090
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer

Beenish Saleem, MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTAR, Asem Hameed, Taimoor Ashraf Khan et al.
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer

Beenish Saleem, MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTAR, Asem Hameed, Taimoor Ashraf Khan, Waseem Yousaf, Abdul Qadir
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the Intraocular Pressure measured by the Goldmann Applanation tonometer with by iCare ic100 tonometer in normal human eye to determine the accuracy and reliability of both methods. Study Design: Comparative cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Ophthalmology Department, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta Pakistan, from Oct 2022 to Apr 2023. Methodology: Approval was secured prior to enrolling every individual, protecting their privacy throughout the process. All instruments adhered to the manufacturer's guidelines for calibration. A single ophthalmologist assessed the intraocular pressure of all participants. In our study we included 400 eyes (200 right and 200 left) among 200 patients. Initially, study eyes were inspected using a slit lamp. Subsequently, iCare tonometer and Goldman applanation tonometer were employed to gauge the intraocular pressure. Results: Out of 200, 87 patients (43.5%) were male and 113(56.5%) were females. Median age of the patients was 51.00(45-58) years range from 22-77 years. Mean IOP measured by iCare was 19.01±7.86 mmHg and by Goldman applanation tonomter was 20.14±8.15 mmHg. The correlation coefficient value between the readings of two instruments was r=0.866 with significant p value (p< 0.001). Conclusion: The iCare ic100 consistently provides high intraocular pressure measurements (2-3mmHg) compared to the Goldmann Applanation tonometer across various sub Groups.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 74(5)
Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), Combined Military Hospital (PK), National University of Medical Sciences (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by iCare Tonometer and Goldman Applanation Tonometer — Beenish Saleem, MUHAMMAD ALI AKHTAR, et al. · Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS