Explaining the Anomaly Detection in Additive Manufacturing via Boosting Models and Frequency Analysis

Anomaly detection is an important feature in modern additive manufacturing (AM) systems to ensure quality of the produced components. Although this topic is well discussed in the literature, current methods rely on black-box approaches, limiting our understanding of why anomalies occur, making complex the root cause identification and the consequent decision support about the action to take to mitigate them. This work addresses these limitations by proposing a structured workflow designed to enhance the explainability of anomaly detection models. Using the wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process as a case study, we examined 14 wall structures printed with INVAR36 alloy under varying process parameters, producing both defect-free and defective parts. These parts were classified based on surface appearance and welding camera images. We collected welding current and voltage data at a 5 kHz sampling rate and extracted features from both time and frequency domains using a knowledge-based approach. Isolation Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, Artificial Neural Network, XGBoost, and LGBM models were trained on these features, and the results shown best performance of boosting models, achieving F1 scores of 0.927 and 0.945, respectively. These models presented higher performance compared to other models like k-Nearest Neighbor, whereas Isolation Forest and Artificial Neural Network posses lower performance due to overfitting, with an F1 score of 0.507 and 0.56, respectively. Then, by leveraging the feature importance capabilities of these models, we identified key signal characteristics that distinguish between normal and anomalous behavior, improving the explainability of the detection process and in general about the process physics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213414
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining the Anomaly Detection in Additive Manufacturing via Boosting Models and Frequency Analysis

Luigi Nele, Silvestro Vespoli, Joseph Polden, Giulio Mattera et al.
6 citations
Mathematics
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
2.09
article

Explaining the Anomaly Detection in Additive Manufacturing via Boosting Models and Frequency Analysis

Luigi Nele, Silvestro Vespoli, Joseph Polden, Giulio Mattera, Mario Vozza, Gianfranco Piscopo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Anomaly detection is an important feature in modern additive manufacturing (AM) systems to ensure quality of the produced components. Although this topic is well discussed in the literature, current methods rely on black-box approaches, limiting our understanding of why anomalies occur, making complex the root cause identification and the consequent decision support about the action to take to mitigate them. This work addresses these limitations by proposing a structured workflow designed to enhance the explainability of anomaly detection models. Using the wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process as a case study, we examined 14 wall structures printed with INVAR36 alloy under varying process parameters, producing both defect-free and defective parts. These parts were classified based on surface appearance and welding camera images. We collected welding current and voltage data at a 5 kHz sampling rate and extracted features from both time and frequency domains using a knowledge-based approach. Isolation Forest, k-Nearest Neighbor, Artificial Neural Network, XGBoost, and LGBM models were trained on these features, and the results shown best performance of boosting models, achieving F1 scores of 0.927 and 0.945, respectively. These models presented higher performance compared to other models like k-Nearest Neighbor, whereas Isolation Forest and Artificial Neural Network posses lower performance due to overfitting, with an F1 score of 0.507 and 0.56, respectively. Then, by leveraging the feature importance capabilities of these models, we identified key signal characteristics that distinguish between normal and anomalous behavior, improving the explainability of the detection process and in general about the process physics.

MathematicsVol. 12(21)
Politecnico di Torino (IT), University of Wollongong (AU), Institute of Structure of Matter (IT), University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.