Measuring Psychological Burden in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Inequalities across Applicants in Stress and Disrespect

Researchers have increasingly documented the importance of administrative burden in access to social programs. Such scholarship has informed a new federal burden-reduction initiative. One significant obstacle to implementing that initiative within federal agencies has been the lack of quantitative indicators for measuring psychological burdens, such as stress and disrespect. This article explores new quantitative measures of psychological burdens, using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) applications as a case study and reports on original exploratory surveys of SNAP applicants. I document the distribution of two measures of psychological burden—stress and disrespect—across different applicants, particularly by age, race, and ethnicity; how these measures compare with other indicators recently proposed by scholars; and how stress and disrespect relate to changing pandemic-era relief policies, state administration, and steps in the application process. These findings provide better tools for researchers and policy makers to measure, track, and reduce psychological burdens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Psychological Burden in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Inequalities across Applicants in Stress and Disrespect

Alexander Hertel‐Fernandez
1 citations
Social Service Review
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
article

Measuring Psychological Burden in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Inequalities across Applicants in Stress and Disrespect

Alexander Hertel‐Fernandez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Researchers have increasingly documented the importance of administrative burden in access to social programs. Such scholarship has informed a new federal burden-reduction initiative. One significant obstacle to implementing that initiative within federal agencies has been the lack of quantitative indicators for measuring psychological burdens, such as stress and disrespect. This article explores new quantitative measures of psychological burdens, using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) applications as a case study and reports on original exploratory surveys of SNAP applicants. I document the distribution of two measures of psychological burden—stress and disrespect—across different applicants, particularly by age, race, and ethnicity; how these measures compare with other indicators recently proposed by scholars; and how stress and disrespect relate to changing pandemic-era relief policies, state administration, and steps in the application process. These findings provide better tools for researchers and policy makers to measure, track, and reduce psychological burdens.

Social Service ReviewVol. 98(4)
Columbia University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Employment and Welfare Studies
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Measuring Psychological Burden in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Inequalities across Applicants in Stress and Disrespect — Alexander Hertel‐Fernandez · Social Service Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS