Non-philosophers’ Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context-Sensitive
Empirical investigation of the conditions under which people prefer, or disprefer, causal explanation, has suggested to many that our judgements about what causally explains what are context-sensitive in a number of ways. This has led many to suppose that whether or not a causal explanation obtains depends on contextual factors: that causal explanation is context-sensitive. Surprisingly, most accounts of metaphysical explanation, by contrast, suppose it to be context insensitive. Only recently have accounts been developed of metaphysical explanation on which it is context-sensitive. To date, however, there is no empirical evidence about the context sensitivity of metaphysical explanation. In what follows we test the judgements of non-philosophers, and find that amongst non-philosophers, at least, metaphysical explanations are context-sensitive. We then consider the implications of this finding for theorising about metaphysical explanation.
Authors
- Kristie Miller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-8419)
- Andrew J. Latham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-8053)
Institutions
- Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts (UA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2024_80_3_0759
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.22