Non-philosophers’ Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context-Sensitive

Empirical investigation of the conditions under which people prefer, or disprefer, causal explanation, has suggested to many that our judgements about what causally explains what are context-sensitive in a number of ways. This has led many to suppose that whether or not a causal explanation obtains depends on contextual factors: that causal explanation is context-sensitive. Surprisingly, most accounts of metaphysical explanation, by contrast, suppose it to be context insensitive. Only recently have accounts been developed of metaphysical explanation on which it is context-sensitive. To date, however, there is no empirical evidence about the context sensitivity of metaphysical explanation. In what follows we test the judgements of non-philosophers, and find that amongst non-philosophers, at least, metaphysical explanations are context-sensitive. We then consider the implications of this finding for theorising about metaphysical explanation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17990/rpf/2024_80_3_0759
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-philosophers’ Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context-Sensitive

Kristie Miller, Andrew J. Latham
1 citations
Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
4.22
article

Non-philosophers’ Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context-Sensitive

Kristie Miller, Andrew J. Latham
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Empirical investigation of the conditions under which people prefer, or disprefer, causal explanation, has suggested to many that our judgements about what causally explains what are context-sensitive in a number of ways. This has led many to suppose that whether or not a causal explanation obtains depends on contextual factors: that causal explanation is context-sensitive. Surprisingly, most accounts of metaphysical explanation, by contrast, suppose it to be context insensitive. Only recently have accounts been developed of metaphysical explanation on which it is context-sensitive. To date, however, there is no empirical evidence about the context sensitivity of metaphysical explanation. In what follows we test the judgements of non-philosophers, and find that amongst non-philosophers, at least, metaphysical explanations are context-sensitive. We then consider the implications of this finding for theorising about metaphysical explanation.

Revista Portuguesa de FilosofiaVol. 80(3)
Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
4.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-philosophers’ Judgements of Metaphysical Explanations are Context-Sensitive — Kristie Miller, Andrew J. Latham · Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS