Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Thyromental Distance with Other Airway (Malampatti and Inter Incisor Distance) Assessment Tests for Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation

Objective: To study the ability of upper lip bite test and thyromental distance to predict difficult endotracheal intubation when compared to standard assessment tests such as Mallampati and inter incisor distance. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesiology, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Sep 2020 to Mar 2021. Methodology: We studied a total of 50 patients who reported for the administration of general anesthesia. All patients underwent evaluation with modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test and thyromental distance test. All participants underwent subsequent intubation according to a standard protocol. The researcher documented difficult intubations. Results: We found the upper lip bite test to have a sensitivity of 75.7%, a specificity of 84.2%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78.6%. Thyromental distance had a sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 51.4%, 78.9% and 60.7%, respectively while the modified Mallampati had a sensitivity of 64.9%, 89.5%, specificity and a diagnostic accuracy of 73.2%. Conclusion: Upper lip bite test is a useful bedside assessment tool with which to predict the probability of a difficult endotracheal intubation. Height to thyromental distance ratio test is also acceptable for rapid assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i5.8112
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Thyromental Distance with Other Airway (Malampatti and Inter Incisor Distance) Assessment Tests for Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation

Tasneem Alam, Muhammad Tayyab Saeed, Muhammad Nasir Saeed, Ali Rao et al.
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Thyromental Distance with Other Airway (Malampatti and Inter Incisor Distance) Assessment Tests for Predicting Difficult Endotracheal Intubation

Tasneem Alam, Muhammad Tayyab Saeed, Muhammad Nasir Saeed, Ali Rao, Azmat Riaz, Hira Ahmad
article en

Abstract

Objective: To study the ability of upper lip bite test and thyromental distance to predict difficult endotracheal intubation when compared to standard assessment tests such as Mallampati and inter incisor distance. Study Design: Cross-sectional validation study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesiology, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Sep 2020 to Mar 2021. Methodology: We studied a total of 50 patients who reported for the administration of general anesthesia. All patients underwent evaluation with modified Mallampati test, upper lip bite test and thyromental distance test. All participants underwent subsequent intubation according to a standard protocol. The researcher documented difficult intubations. Results: We found the upper lip bite test to have a sensitivity of 75.7%, a specificity of 84.2%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78.6%. Thyromental distance had a sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 51.4%, 78.9% and 60.7%, respectively while the modified Mallampati had a sensitivity of 64.9%, 89.5%, specificity and a diagnostic accuracy of 73.2%. Conclusion: Upper lip bite test is a useful bedside assessment tool with which to predict the probability of a difficult endotracheal intubation. Height to thyromental distance ratio test is also acceptable for rapid assessment.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 74(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.