Understanding the Complexity of Executions in Religious Courts: Between Legal Mandates and Field Realities

This article examines the complexities in the implementation of rulings in religious courts, highlighting the division between legal theory and its practical implementation in the field. Religious courts, as important institutions in a country's legal system, aim to uphold justice in the legal context of Islam or other religions. However, behind the clear legal mandate, there are real challenges in the execution of judgments, reflecting the reality of social, cultural, and political complexity. The analysis in this article refers to the difference between an ideal legal theory and the often complex reality of the field. Factors such as social norms, gender inequality, and changes in societal values can affect executions in religious courts. In addition, limited resources, lack of legal infrastructure, and administrative challenges are also major obstacles. Using a multidimensional approach, this article explores various aspects that influence the effectiveness of executions in religious courts. This provides a deeper understanding of the complexities of the legal system and highlights the need for a holistic approach in understanding and addressing these challenges. In this context, the article also evaluates reform efforts that can be undertaken to improve efficiency and fairness in the implementation of rulings in religious courts. In conclusion, this article asserts that to understand and address the complexities of executions in religious courts, a comprehensive approach is needed that considers both legal aspects and social, cultural, and political realities on the ground. Thus, this article is expected to serve as a basis for further discussion and reform efforts in the religious justice system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of As Suadi.
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70691/assuadi.v1i1.5
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Complexity of Executions in Religious Courts: Between Legal Mandates and Field Realities

Muhamad Fakhrudin, Muhammad Ali Nasir, Nandang Akhmad Kosasih
International Journal of As Suadi.
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Understanding the Complexity of Executions in Religious Courts: Between Legal Mandates and Field Realities

Muhamad Fakhrudin, Muhammad Ali Nasir, Nandang Akhmad Kosasih
article en

Abstract

This article examines the complexities in the implementation of rulings in religious courts, highlighting the division between legal theory and its practical implementation in the field. Religious courts, as important institutions in a country's legal system, aim to uphold justice in the legal context of Islam or other religions. However, behind the clear legal mandate, there are real challenges in the execution of judgments, reflecting the reality of social, cultural, and political complexity. The analysis in this article refers to the difference between an ideal legal theory and the often complex reality of the field. Factors such as social norms, gender inequality, and changes in societal values can affect executions in religious courts. In addition, limited resources, lack of legal infrastructure, and administrative challenges are also major obstacles. Using a multidimensional approach, this article explores various aspects that influence the effectiveness of executions in religious courts. This provides a deeper understanding of the complexities of the legal system and highlights the need for a holistic approach in understanding and addressing these challenges. In this context, the article also evaluates reform efforts that can be undertaken to improve efficiency and fairness in the implementation of rulings in religious courts. In conclusion, this article asserts that to understand and address the complexities of executions in religious courts, a comprehensive approach is needed that considers both legal aspects and social, cultural, and political realities on the ground. Thus, this article is expected to serve as a basis for further discussion and reform efforts in the religious justice system.

International Journal of As Suadi.Vol. 1(1)
Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University (ID), Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu (ID)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.