A Comparative Study on Lung Nodule Detection: 3D CNN vs Vision Transformer

Early detection of lung cancer is essential to reduce mortality. CT scans are an effective imaging technique for detecting lung cancer but often produce false positives that can lead to unnecessary invasive procedures. This study compared the reduction of false positives in the detection of lung nodules using two 3D methods: CNN and ViT. This study using LUNA16 dataset obtained the results that CNN, with the ability to capture complex spatial features, showed superior performance in reducing false positives compared to ViT, with an accuracy of 92%, precision of 84%, sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 90%, Fl-score of 89%, and false positives value of 40. In addition, CNN has a shorter training time than ViT, which requires higher computation and longer training time. Therefore, 3D CNN is more effective in reducing false positives in detecting lung nodules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icitisee63424.2024.10729900
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on Lung Nodule Detection: 3D CNN vs Vision Transformer

Sholy Putri Fauzya, Hanung Adi Nugroho, Igi Ardiyanto
2 citations
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.84
article

A Comparative Study on Lung Nodule Detection: 3D CNN vs Vision Transformer

Sholy Putri Fauzya, Hanung Adi Nugroho, Igi Ardiyanto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Early detection of lung cancer is essential to reduce mortality. CT scans are an effective imaging technique for detecting lung cancer but often produce false positives that can lead to unnecessary invasive procedures. This study compared the reduction of false positives in the detection of lung nodules using two 3D methods: CNN and ViT. This study using LUNA16 dataset obtained the results that CNN, with the ability to capture complex spatial features, showed superior performance in reducing false positives compared to ViT, with an accuracy of 92%, precision of 84%, sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 90%, Fl-score of 89%, and false positives value of 40. In addition, CNN has a shorter training time than ViT, which requires higher computation and longer training time. Therefore, 3D CNN is more effective in reducing false positives in detecting lung nodules.

Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study on Lung Nodule Detection: 3D CNN vs Vision Transformer — Sholy Putri Fauzya, Hanung Adi Nugroho, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS