Dynamic Regret for Distributed Online Composite Optimization

This article focuses on online composite optimization over multiagent networks. In the distributed setting, each agent has its own local loss function, which consists of a convex, strongly convex or strongly convex and smooth function, and a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer. Two distributed online algorithms are proposed and corresponding dynamic regrets are analyzed. Two proposed algorithms are based on signs of relative states. The first algorithm obtains <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T}(C_{T}+1))$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound when each local loss is a general convex composite function, where <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the path variation. If <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> can be estimated in advance for convex or strongly convex local loss with a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer, then dynamic regret bounds are, respectively, in the order of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T(C_{T}+1)})$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\log T(1+C_{T}))$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The second algorithm is based on the first one, especially for handling the local loss composed of a strongly convex and smooth function with a nonsmooth regularizer, and then obtains <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(1+C_{T})$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound. In the end, numerical results are given to support the theoretical findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2024.3489222
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Optimization and Search Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Regret for Distributed Online Composite Optimization

Xiuxian Li, R.Z. Hou, Yang Yu
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Optimization and Search Problems
1.05
article

Dynamic Regret for Distributed Online Composite Optimization

Xiuxian Li, R.Z. Hou, Yang Yu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on online composite optimization over multiagent networks. In the distributed setting, each agent has its own local loss function, which consists of a convex, strongly convex or strongly convex and smooth function, and a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer. Two distributed online algorithms are proposed and corresponding dynamic regrets are analyzed. Two proposed algorithms are based on signs of relative states. The first algorithm obtains <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T}(C_{T}+1))$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound when each local loss is a general convex composite function, where <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the path variation. If <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> can be estimated in advance for convex or strongly convex local loss with a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer, then dynamic regret bounds are, respectively, in the order of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T(C_{T}+1)})$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(\log T(1+C_{T}))$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The second algorithm is based on the first one, especially for handling the local loss composed of a strongly convex and smooth function with a nonsmooth regularizer, and then obtains <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {O}(1+C_{T})$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound. In the end, numerical results are given to support the theoretical findings.

IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlVol. 70(5)
Tongji University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Optimization and Search Problems
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.