Towards Model Repair by Human Opinion--Guided Reinforcement Learning

Model repair often entails long sequences of model transformations. Finding the correct model repair sequence is challenging, and its complexity increases with the number of model transformations involved in the repair sequence. In realistic, longitudinally extensive modelling settings, the same model repair scenarios might be encountered repeatedly, providing an excellent opportunity to learn the most appropriate repair actions through reinforcement learning (RL). While such ideas have been explored before, the efficiency of RL-based methods in long repair sequences is still an open challenge. In this paper, we propose a method to improve learning performance by human opinions---cognitive constructs that are subject to uncertainty, but also emerge earlier than hard evidence. Our findings indicate that opinion-based guidance significantly improves the learning performance, even with moderately uncertain human opinions. To counter the uncertainty of individual human advisors, our method allows for collaborative guidance by experts of various expertise and skill levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3652620.3676878
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Model Repair by Human Opinion--Guided Reinforcement Learning

Kyanna Dagenais
2 citations
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
0.69
article

Towards Model Repair by Human Opinion--Guided Reinforcement Learning

Kyanna Dagenais
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Model repair often entails long sequences of model transformations. Finding the correct model repair sequence is challenging, and its complexity increases with the number of model transformations involved in the repair sequence. In realistic, longitudinally extensive modelling settings, the same model repair scenarios might be encountered repeatedly, providing an excellent opportunity to learn the most appropriate repair actions through reinforcement learning (RL). While such ideas have been explored before, the efficiency of RL-based methods in long repair sequences is still an open challenge. In this paper, we propose a method to improve learning performance by human opinions---cognitive constructs that are subject to uncertainty, but also emerge earlier than hard evidence. Our findings indicate that opinion-based guidance significantly improves the learning performance, even with moderately uncertain human opinions. To counter the uncertainty of individual human advisors, our method allows for collaborative guidance by experts of various expertise and skill levels.

McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards Model Repair by Human Opinion--Guided Reinforcement Learning — Kyanna Dagenais · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS