A comprehensive item bank of internal validity issues of relevance to in vitro toxicology studies

To our knowledge, this is the second item bank of any kind to have been created for toxicology studies, and the first to use focus groups as a data source alongside literature analysis. The large number of items contributed by focus group discussions suggests this is an efficient method for capturing internal validity issues that are not easily identifiable in the literature. We believe our item bank and methodology for its creation will be a useful resource for supporting the development of appraisal tools. Due to the broad applicability of many items in the item bank, it may be informative for study designs beyond the <i>in vitro</i> domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence-Based Toxicology
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2418045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive item bank of internal validity issues of relevance to in vitro toxicology studies

Trine Husøy, Heather Ames, Erwin Roggen, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al.
1 citations
Evidence-Based Toxicology
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
0.71
article

A comprehensive item bank of internal validity issues of relevance to in vitro toxicology studies

Trine Husøy, Heather Ames, Erwin Roggen, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, Pilar Prieto, Gro Haarklou Mathisen, Andrew A. Rooney, Paul Whaley, Camilla Svendsen, Joshua F. Robinson, Olga Tcheremenskaia, Ingrid L. Druwe, Nicolas Roth, Mathieu Vinken, Eliana Spilioti, Sebastian Hoffmann, Anastasia Spyropoulou, Carlijn R. Hooijmans, Kyriaki Machera, Emanuela Testai, Anna Beronius, Thomas Härtung, Emma Di Consiglio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To our knowledge, this is the second item bank of any kind to have been created for toxicology studies, and the first to use focus groups as a data source alongside literature analysis. The large number of items contributed by focus group discussions suggests this is an efficient method for capturing internal validity issues that are not easily identifiable in the literature. We believe our item bank and methodology for its creation will be a useful resource for supporting the development of appraisal tools. Due to the broad applicability of many items in the item bank, it may be informative for study designs beyond the <i>in vitro</i> domain.

Evidence-Based ToxicologyVol. 2(1)
Environmental Protection Agency (US), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (IT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Johns Hopkins University (US), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of California, San Francisco (US), Environmental Protection Agency (GH), University of Basel (CH), University of Konstanz (DE), European Commission (BE), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Triangle (US), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US), Joint Research Centre (IT), National Institute of Health (AM), Benaki Phytopathological Institute (GR), ABS Consulting (United States) (US), BH Consulting (Ireland) (IE), Pharmac (NZ), Environmental Protection Agency (IE), Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, Lancaster University (GB)
University of New South Wales, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.