Challenging the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Clinical Practice Update on Screening for Pre-existing Diabetes and Early Gestational Diabetes

A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Practice Update continues to recommend targeted (as opposed to universal) screening for pregestational diabetes, no longer recommends screening for early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and provides updated guidelines for immediate postpartum testing for diabetes in patients with GDM. Here, we present data that the targeted screening paradigm, which has repeatedly been shown to fail in practice because of its complexity, no longer makes sense in the context of the high and rising prevalence of diabetes and diabetic risk factors, and we argue that the time has come for universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendation against early screening for GDM is based on 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidance, which in turn is based almost entirely on a single underpowered study that excluded individuals at highest risk and does not account for more recent research showing benefits of early diagnosis and treatment. Universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes may also help to identify patients at risk who will benefit from early GDM diagnosis and treatment and may provide rationale for prioritizing postpartum diabetes testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005777
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Clinical Practice Update on Screening for Pre-existing Diabetes and Early Gestational Diabetes

Kent Heyborne, Linda A. Barbour
7 citations
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
4.08
article

Challenging the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Clinical Practice Update on Screening for Pre-existing Diabetes and Early Gestational Diabetes

Kent Heyborne, Linda A. Barbour
article en
7 citations

Abstract

A recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Clinical Practice Update continues to recommend targeted (as opposed to universal) screening for pregestational diabetes, no longer recommends screening for early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and provides updated guidelines for immediate postpartum testing for diabetes in patients with GDM. Here, we present data that the targeted screening paradigm, which has repeatedly been shown to fail in practice because of its complexity, no longer makes sense in the context of the high and rising prevalence of diabetes and diabetic risk factors, and we argue that the time has come for universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes. Furthermore, the recommendation against early screening for GDM is based on 2021 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidance, which in turn is based almost entirely on a single underpowered study that excluded individuals at highest risk and does not account for more recent research showing benefits of early diagnosis and treatment. Universal early pregnancy screening for pregestational diabetes may also help to identify patients at risk who will benefit from early GDM diagnosis and treatment and may provide rationale for prioritizing postpartum diabetes testing.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 145(1)
Twitter (United States) (US), University of Colorado Hospital (US), National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (GB), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.