Does preheating affect the microleakage of bulk-fill composite restorations?

Aim: Microleakage is one of the most important factors in restoration failure in today’s dentistry. The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microleakage of preheated bulk-fill composites. Methodology: In the study, 160 slot cavities prepared in the mesial and distal of 80 molar teeth were used. In the gingival of the cavities, Estelite Bulk Fill Flow (Tokuyama, Tokyo, Japan) in the mesial and SDR® Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) in the distal were used, and the remaining occlusal parts were restored using FiltekTM One Bulk Fill Restorative (3M, St Paul, MN, US). Composites were applied at four different temperatures (4oC, room temperature, 39oC and 55oC). After finishing and polishing, specimens were thermocycled and then placed in 0.5% methylene blue for 24 hours. Specimens were sectioned into two parts in a mesiodistal direction, and the microleakage levels were examined by a stereomicroscope (x40). Results: In the statistical evaluation of the microleakage levels of FiltekTM One Bulk Fill Restorative applied at four different temperatures on the occlusal surface with One-way ANOVA, it was observed that there was a significant difference between the groups (p=0.02). In the comparison of the microleakage values of Estelite Bulk Fill Flow applied in the gingival region with the one-way ANOVA test at four different temperatures, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05), while there was a significant difference between the groups using SDR® Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base (p=0.002). The highest microleakage values were observed at 4oC in all groups. Conclusion: The results obtained in the study show that heating bulk fill composites before polymerization is effective in reducing microleakages, but longer in vivo studies are required. How to cite this article: Aktuğ Karademir S, Akarsu S. Does preheating affect the microleakage of bulk fill composite restorations?. Int Dent Res 2024;14(2):84-92. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.481

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Research
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.481
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does preheating affect the microleakage of bulk-fill composite restorations?

Serdar Akarsu, Sultan Aktuğ Karademir
International Dental Research
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Does preheating affect the microleakage of bulk-fill composite restorations?

Serdar Akarsu, Sultan Aktuğ Karademir
article en

Abstract

Aim: Microleakage is one of the most important factors in restoration failure in today’s dentistry. The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microleakage of preheated bulk-fill composites. Methodology: In the study, 160 slot cavities prepared in the mesial and distal of 80 molar teeth were used. In the gingival of the cavities, Estelite Bulk Fill Flow (Tokuyama, Tokyo, Japan) in the mesial and SDR® Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) in the distal were used, and the remaining occlusal parts were restored using FiltekTM One Bulk Fill Restorative (3M, St Paul, MN, US). Composites were applied at four different temperatures (4oC, room temperature, 39oC and 55oC). After finishing and polishing, specimens were thermocycled and then placed in 0.5% methylene blue for 24 hours. Specimens were sectioned into two parts in a mesiodistal direction, and the microleakage levels were examined by a stereomicroscope (x40). Results: In the statistical evaluation of the microleakage levels of FiltekTM One Bulk Fill Restorative applied at four different temperatures on the occlusal surface with One-way ANOVA, it was observed that there was a significant difference between the groups (p=0.02). In the comparison of the microleakage values of Estelite Bulk Fill Flow applied in the gingival region with the one-way ANOVA test at four different temperatures, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05), while there was a significant difference between the groups using SDR® Posterior Bulk Fill Flowable Base (p=0.002). The highest microleakage values were observed at 4oC in all groups. Conclusion: The results obtained in the study show that heating bulk fill composites before polymerization is effective in reducing microleakages, but longer in vivo studies are required. How to cite this article: Aktuğ Karademir S, Akarsu S. Does preheating affect the microleakage of bulk fill composite restorations?. Int Dent Res 2024;14(2):84-92. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.481

International Dental ResearchVol. 14(2)
Ordu University (TR)
Ordu Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.