Triple junction benchmark for multiphase-field models combining capillary and bulk driving forces

Abstract A benchmark problem is formulated which is well suited for the validation of mesoscopic phase-field models for grain-boundary migration in polycrystals. First, an analytical steady-state solution of the sharp moving boundary problem is derived for a symmetric lamellar structure, which is valid for arbitrary bulk driving forces and triple junction angles. Characteristic quantities are identified to reduce the parameter space which in turn allows a systematic comparison of simulations and analytical results. Various multiphase-field (MPF) formulations are compared which approximate the sharp interface problem in terms of a diffuse regularization. An interfacial thickness convergence study reveals that the model error is largely dependent on the ratio of bulk to interfacial stabilizing force as well as the underlying model formulation. An additional grid convergence study highlights the efficiency of a more advanced discretization scheme. The results can be used to guide the selection of appropriate models and to estimate the interface thickness and spatial resolution required to achieve a given accuracy target. The post-processing framework consists of a fully automated determination of well-defined metrics from the phase field simulation data, eliminating human bias and facilitating reproducibility. The corresponding code is made openly available to assist the materials science and engineering community in validating MPF, multi-order parameter and similar model developments. We believe that this work provides a reliable benchmark procedure to better understand the potentials and limitations of current MPF models as well as alternative approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad8d6f
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triple junction benchmark for multiphase-field models combining capillary and bulk driving forces

Simon Daubner, Bin Zhou, Paul W. Hoffrogge, Janin Eiken et al.
8 citations
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
0.94
article

Triple junction benchmark for multiphase-field models combining capillary and bulk driving forces

Simon Daubner, Bin Zhou, Paul W. Hoffrogge, Janin Eiken, Britta Nestler, Daniel Schneider
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract A benchmark problem is formulated which is well suited for the validation of mesoscopic phase-field models for grain-boundary migration in polycrystals. First, an analytical steady-state solution of the sharp moving boundary problem is derived for a symmetric lamellar structure, which is valid for arbitrary bulk driving forces and triple junction angles. Characteristic quantities are identified to reduce the parameter space which in turn allows a systematic comparison of simulations and analytical results. Various multiphase-field (MPF) formulations are compared which approximate the sharp interface problem in terms of a diffuse regularization. An interfacial thickness convergence study reveals that the model error is largely dependent on the ratio of bulk to interfacial stabilizing force as well as the underlying model formulation. An additional grid convergence study highlights the efficiency of a more advanced discretization scheme. The results can be used to guide the selection of appropriate models and to estimate the interface thickness and spatial resolution required to achieve a given accuracy target. The post-processing framework consists of a fully automated determination of well-defined metrics from the phase field simulation data, eliminating human bias and facilitating reproducibility. The corresponding code is made openly available to assist the materials science and engineering community in validating MPF, multi-order parameter and similar model developments. We believe that this work provides a reliable benchmark procedure to better understand the potentials and limitations of current MPF models as well as alternative approaches.

Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and EngineeringVol. 33(1)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Access (DE), Institute of Nanotechnology (GB), Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.