Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Abstract Effective private land conservation strategies that consider both landholder preferences and future climatic conditions are critical for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the interaction and relative importance of these factors for conservation planning performance is unknown. Here, we assess the importance of considering landholder preferences and climate change for prioritising locations for conservation tenders to recruit landholders for conservation covenants. To achieve this we develop a planning framework that accounts for the tender process to optimise investment across regions and apply it to koala-focused tenders in New South Wales, Australia, exploring four planning approaches that consider or are ignorant to landholder preferences or climate change. We find that optimal investments depend more on landholder preferences than climate change, and when landholder preferences are ignored, there is little benefit in accounting for climate change. Our analysis reveals new insights into this important interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8d6b
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Jaramar Villarreal‐Rosas, Jillian Thonell, JAMES A. FITZSIMONS, Jonathan R. Rhodes et al.
5 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
article

Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Jaramar Villarreal‐Rosas, Jillian Thonell, JAMES A. FITZSIMONS, Jonathan R. Rhodes, James Brazill‐Boast, Sarah Bekessy, Clive McAlpine, Michael Drielsma, Brooke Williams, Linda J. Beaumont, Md Sayed Iftekhar, Carla L. Archibald, Scott Benitez Hetherington, Frankie H. T. Cho, Daniel Lunney, Rajesh B. Thapa, Jamie Love
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Effective private land conservation strategies that consider both landholder preferences and future climatic conditions are critical for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the interaction and relative importance of these factors for conservation planning performance is unknown. Here, we assess the importance of considering landholder preferences and climate change for prioritising locations for conservation tenders to recruit landholders for conservation covenants. To achieve this we develop a planning framework that accounts for the tender process to optimise investment across regions and apply it to koala-focused tenders in New South Wales, Australia, exploring four planning approaches that consider or are ignorant to landholder preferences or climate change. We find that optimal investments depend more on landholder preferences than climate change, and when landholder preferences are ignored, there is little benefit in accounting for climate change. Our analysis reveals new insights into this important interaction.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(12)
Griffith University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AU), Australian Museum (AU), NSW Department of Planning and Environment (AU), Deakin University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Exeter (GB), Sydney Water (AU), Tweed Shire Council (AU), MIT University (MK), Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (AU), RMIT University (AU), University of New England (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.