Quantitative assessment of areal bone mineral density using multi-energy localizer radiographs from photon-counting detector CT
<i>Objective.</i>To assess the accuracy and stability of areal bone-mineral-density (aBMD) measurements from multi-energy CT localizer radiographs acquired using photon-counting detector (PCD) CT.<i>Approach.</i>A European Spine Phantom (ESP) with hydroxyapatite (HA 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g cm<sup>-2</sup>) was scanned using clinical PCD-CT and a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to compare aBMD values. To assess aBMD stability and reproducibility, PCD-localizers were acquired twice a day for one week, and once per week for five weeks. Multiple ESP anteroposterior thicknesses (18, 26, 34, and 40 cm) were achieved using a synthetic gel layer and scanned across eight tube current values for both 120 kV (15-120 mA) and 140 kV (10-80 mA). One-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical significance (<i>p</i>< 0.05 considered significant). Quantitative HA and water maps were reconstructed using a prototype material-decomposition software, and aBMD was calculated after background correction.<i>In vivo</i>performance of PCD-based aBMD was illustrated using a patient scan acquired at 140 kV and 40 mA, and lumbar aBMD values were compared with DXA.<i>Main results.</i>The ESP aBMD values from PCD-localizers demonstrated excellent day-to-day stability with a coefficient-of-variation ranging from 0.42% to 0.53%, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of less than 5% for all three vertebral bodies. The coefficient-of-variation for weekly scans ranged from 0.17% to 0.60%, again with MAPE below 5% for all three vertebral bodies. Across phantom sizes and tube currents, the MAPE values varied ranging from 1.84% to 13.78% for 120 kV, and 1.38%-9.11% for 140 kV. No significant difference was found between different tube currents. For the standard phantom size, DXA showed 11.21% MAPE whereas PCD-CT showed 3.04% MAPE. For the patient scan, deviation between PCD-based aBMD values and those obtained from DXA ranged from 0.07% to 9.82% for different lumbar vertebra.<i>Significance.</i>This study highlights the accuracy and stability of PCD-CT localizers for measuring aBMD. We demonstrated aBMD accuracy across different sizes and showed that higher radiation doses did not inherently increase aBMD accuracy.
Authors
- Tristan Nowak
- Kishore Rajendran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8314-3642)
- Francis Baffour (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8005-4823)
- Cynthia H. McCollough (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-332X)
- Elisabeth R. Shanblatt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3272-0590)
- Ahmed O El Sadaney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1122-5828)
- Joseph R. Swicklik
- Andrea Ferrero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-8913)
- Sören Jasper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6954-9045)
Institutions
- Siemens (Germany) (DE)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Medical Solutions (GB)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US)
- Siemens Healthineers (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physics in Medicine and Biology
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad8da1
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.55