TMEM106B-mediated SARS-CoV-2 infection allows for robust ACE2-independent infection in vitro but not in vivo
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the primary entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but ACE2-independent entry has been observed in vitro for strains with the spike-E484D substitution. Here, we conduct a whole-genome CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen using SARS-CoV-2 mouse adapted 1 (SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub>), which carries spike-E484D, to identify the ACE2-independent entry mechanisms. SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> infection in HEK293T cells relies on heparan sulfate and endocytic pathways, with TMEM106B, a transmembrane lysosomal protein, the most significant contributor. While SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> productively infects human brain organoids and K18-hACE2 mouse brains, it does not infect C57BL/6J or Ifnar<sup>-/-</sup> mouse brains. This suggests that ACE2-independent entry via TMEM106B, which is predominantly expressed in the brain, does not overtly increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasiveness in mice with endogenous Ace2 expression. Importantly, SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> does not replicate in the Ace2<sup>-/-</sup> mouse respiratory tract. Overall, this suggests that robust ACE2-independent infection by SARS-CoV-2<sub>MA1</sub> is likely an in vitro phenomenon with no apparent implications for infection in vivo.
Authors
- Wilson Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5789-4928)
- Daniel J. Rawle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7248-0101)
- Kexin Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-217X)
- Andreas Suhrbier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-9025)
- Cameron R. Bishop
- Troy Dumenil (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-8360)
- Romal Stewart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2195-894X)
- Bing Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-2160)
Institutions
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
- Australian e-Health Research Centre (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cell Reports
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114921
- Citations
- 14
- Primary Topic
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.45